Advertisement
MCHVY vs MLCO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHVY is a Hold and MLCO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCHVY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMLCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MCHVY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MLCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCHVY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MCHVY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MLCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MCHVY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -13.30% price change this week, while MLCO (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +0.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
MLCO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.14% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| MCHVY | MLCO | MCHVY / MLCO | |
| Capitalization | 6.82B | 3.08B | 222% |
| EBITDA | 7.78B | 1.05B | 741% |
| Gain YTD | 47.274 | 36.097 | 131% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.60 | 55.89 | 21% |
| Revenue | 31.8B | 4.93B | 645% |
| Total Cash | 5.52B | 1.12B | 493% |
| Total Debt | 21.8B | 7.46B | 292% |
MCHVY | MLCO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 33 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MCHVY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLCO (80) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MCHVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCHVY's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLCO (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MCHVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCHVY's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLCO (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MCHVY’s stock grew significantly faster than MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCHVY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MLCO (52) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCHVY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as MLCO (45) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
| MCHVY | MLCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GESIX | 19.25 | 0.09 | +0.47% |
| Lazard Global Equity Select Port Instl | |||
| PAGYX | 22.69 | 0.07 | +0.31% |
| Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr Y | |||
| TRZSX | 16.01 | 0.02 | +0.13% |
| T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Z | |||
| DINIX | 23.99 | -0.12 | -0.50% |
| BNY Mellon International Stock Index I | |||
| JUSMX | 19.48 | -0.10 | -0.51% |
| JPMorgan US Small Company R6 | |||
MCHVY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHVY and AAPI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHVY and AAPI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHVY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHVY | 100% | N/A | ||
| AAPI - MCHVY | 23% Poorly correlated | +28.95% | ||
| MLCO - MCHVY | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.90% | ||
| WYNN - MCHVY | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.63% | ||
| SCHYY - MCHVY | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.95% | ||
| GXYEF - MCHVY | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||
MLCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLCO has been closely correlated with LVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLCO jumps, then LVS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLCO | 100% | -3.90% | ||
| LVS - MLCO | 69% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| WYNN - MLCO | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| SCHYY - MLCO | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| GXYYY - MLCO | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| MGM - MLCO | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||