MDIBY
Price
$22.62
Change
+$0.50 (+2.26%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
11.23B
UNCFF
Price
$61.16
Change
+$1.01 (+1.68%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
45.77B
Ad is loading...

MDIBY vs UNCFF

Header iconMDIBY vs UNCFF Comparison
Open Charts MDIBY vs UNCFFBanner chart's image
MedioBanca SpA
Price$22.62
Change+$0.50 (+2.26%)
Volume$11.4K
Capitalization11.23B
UniCredito Spa
Price$61.16
Change+$1.01 (+1.68%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization45.77B
MDIBY vs UNCFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MDIBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MDIBY vs. UNCFF commentary
May 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDIBY is a StrongBuy and UNCFF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 10, 2025
Stock price -- (MDIBY: $22.62 vs. UNCFF: $61.16)
Brand notoriety: MDIBY and UNCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDIBY: 75% vs. UNCFF: 17%
Market capitalization -- MDIBY: $11.23B vs. UNCFF: $45.77B
MDIBY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.23B. UNCFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $45.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDIBY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUNCFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MDIBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UNCFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MDIBY and UNCFF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDIBY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNCFF’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MDIBY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNCFF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNCFF is a better buy in the short-term than MDIBY.

Price Growth

MDIBY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.84% price change this week, while UNCFF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNCFF($45.8B) has a higher market cap than MDIBY($11.2B). MDIBY has higher P/E ratio than UNCFF: MDIBY (9.84) vs UNCFF (5.29). MDIBY YTD gains are higher at: 58.626 vs. UNCFF (52.838). MDIBY has less debt than UNCFF: MDIBY (22.3B) vs UNCFF (93B). UNCFF has higher revenues than MDIBY: UNCFF (23.1B) vs MDIBY (2.85B).
MDIBYUNCFFMDIBY / UNCFF
Capitalization11.2B45.8B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD58.62652.838111%
P/E Ratio9.845.29186%
Revenue2.85B23.1B12%
Total Cash117MN/A-
Total Debt22.3B93B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDIBY vs UNCFF: Fundamental Ratings
MDIBY
UNCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2438
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3318
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDIBY's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (99). This means that MDIBY’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (5). This means that MDIBY’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBY (8). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to MDIBY’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (37). This means that MDIBY’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBY (33). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to MDIBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDIBYUNCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MDIBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMHC23.910.04
+0.17%
SPDR® Bloomberg EM USD Bd ETF
JULD24.980.02
+0.06%
Innovator Premium Income 10 Bar ETF -Jul
IBHJ25.900.01
+0.02%
iShares iBonds 2030 Term Hi Yld & IncETF
ETY14.25-0.03
-0.21%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
MODL39.19-0.17
-0.43%
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF

MDIBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDIBY has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDIBY jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDIBY
1D Price
Change %
MDIBY100%
+2.26%
ISNPY - MDIBY
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
UNCRY - MDIBY
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
BNPQY - MDIBY
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
EBKDY - MDIBY
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
CRARY - MDIBY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More

UNCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNCFF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNCFF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNCFF
1D Price
Change %
UNCFF100%
+1.67%
ISNPY - UNCFF
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
CRZBY - UNCFF
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.13%
BKRIY - UNCFF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
MDIBY - UNCFF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
KBCSY - UNCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More