MDIBY
Price
$24.08
Change
-$0.37 (-1.51%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
19.45B
UNCFF
Price
$77.34
Change
-$1.75 (-2.21%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
118.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MDIBY vs UNCFF

Header iconMDIBY vs UNCFF Comparison
Open Charts MDIBY vs UNCFFBanner chart's image
MedioBanca SpA
Price$24.08
Change-$0.37 (-1.51%)
Volume$2.66K
Capitalization19.45B
UniCredito Spa
Price$77.34
Change-$1.75 (-2.21%)
Volume$1.18K
Capitalization118.6B
MDIBY vs UNCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MDIBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MDIBY vs. UNCFF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDIBY is a StrongBuy and UNCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MDIBY: $24.08 vs. UNCFF: $77.34)
Brand notoriety: MDIBY and UNCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDIBY: 29% vs. UNCFF: 42%
Market capitalization -- MDIBY: $19.45B vs. UNCFF: $118.6B
MDIBY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $19.45B. UNCFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $118.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDIBY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUNCFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MDIBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UNCFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDIBY is a better buy in the long-term than UNCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDIBY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNCFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MDIBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UNCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDIBY is a better buy in the short-term than UNCFF.

Price Growth

MDIBY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.76% price change this week, while UNCFF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNCFF($119B) has a higher market cap than MDIBY($19.4B). MDIBY has higher P/E ratio than UNCFF: MDIBY (12.84) vs UNCFF (10.02). UNCFF YTD gains are higher at: 93.274 vs. MDIBY (73.533). UNCFF has higher revenues than MDIBY: UNCFF (26.7B) vs MDIBY (3.37B).
MDIBYUNCFFMDIBY / UNCFF
Capitalization19.4B119B16%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD73.53393.27479%
P/E Ratio12.8410.02128%
Revenue3.37B26.7B13%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A128B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDIBY vs UNCFF: Fundamental Ratings
MDIBY
UNCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2387
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
114
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2213
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDIBY's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (70). This means that MDIBY’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (4). This means that MDIBY’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBY (11). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to MDIBY’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBY (42). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to MDIBY’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBY (22). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to MDIBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDIBYUNCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MDIBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POWI46.730.63
+1.37%
Power Integrations
SHBI17.100.19
+1.12%
Shore Bancshares
ALZN2.460.02
+0.82%
Alzamend Neuro Inc.
ACM125.640.08
+0.06%
Aecom
XBIT3.48-0.02
-0.57%
XBiotech

MDIBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDIBY has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDIBY jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDIBY
1D Price
Change %
MDIBY100%
-1.53%
ISNPY - MDIBY
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
UNCRY - MDIBY
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
BNPQY - MDIBY
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
EBKDY - MDIBY
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
CRARY - MDIBY
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
More

UNCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNCFF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNCFF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNCFF
1D Price
Change %
UNCFF100%
-2.21%
ISNPY - UNCFF
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
CRZBY - UNCFF
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.42%
BKRIY - UNCFF
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
MDIBY - UNCFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
KBCSY - UNCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More