MET
Price
$82.25
Change
+$0.54 (+0.66%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
34 days until earnings call
MFC
Price
$30.67
Change
+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
55 days until earnings call
PRU
Price
$119.26
Change
+$0.70 (+0.59%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
47 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MET or MFC or PRU

Header iconMET vs MFC vs PRU Comparison
Open Charts MET vs MFC vs PRUBanner chart's image
MetLife
Price$82.25
Change+$0.54 (+0.66%)
Volume$1.08M
CapitalizationN/A
Manulife Financial
Price$30.67
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Volume$493.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Prudential Financial
Price$119.26
Change+$0.70 (+0.59%)
Volume$435.62K
CapitalizationN/A
MET vs MFC vs PRU Comparison Chart
Loading...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (MET: $82.25MFC: $30.67PRU: $119.26)
Brand notoriety: MET and PRU are notable and MFC is not notable
The three companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MET: 31%, MFC: 23%, PRU: 28%
Market capitalization -- MET: $53.28B, MFC: $44.61B, PRU: $42.17B
$MET is valued at $53.28B, while MFC has a market capitalization of $44.61B, and PRU's market capitalization is $42.17B. The market cap for tickers in this @Life/Health Insurance ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Life/Health Insurance industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MET’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and PRU’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PRU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the long-term than MET, which in turn is a better option than PRU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MET’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and PRU’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MET’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PRU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the short-term than PRU, which in turn is a better option than MFC.

Price Growth

MET (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.20% , and PRU (@Life/Health Insurance) price fluctuated +0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

MET is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

PRU is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.59% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than MFC($44.6B) and PRU($42.2B). MET has higher P/E ratio than PRU and MFC: MET (40.71) vs PRU (17.25) and MFC (12.74). MFC YTD gains are higher at: 38.778 vs. MET (28.252) and PRU (20.194). PRU has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. MET (308B) and MFC (20.3B). MFC has less debt than MET and PRU: MFC (12.7B) vs MET (18.8B) and PRU (20.9B). MET has higher revenues than PRU and MFC: MET (66.4B) vs PRU (54.3B) and MFC (42.3B).
METMFCPRU
Capitalization53.3B44.6B42.2B
EBITDAN/AN/AN/A
Gain YTD28.25238.77820.194
P/E Ratio40.7112.7417.25
Revenue66.4B42.3B54.3B
Total Cash308B20.3B341B
Total Debt18.8B12.7B20.9B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MET vs MFC vs PRU: Fundamental Ratings
MET
MFC
PRU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
743482
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
183530
SMR RATING
1..100
99100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
484753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
758550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRU's Valuation (17) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MFC (33) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry, and is in the same range as MET (39) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU's stock grew similarly to MFC’s and similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (30) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as MFC (35) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that MET's stock grew similarly to PRU’s and similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MET's SMR Rating (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as MFC (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that MET's stock grew similarly to PRU’s and similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (48) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry, and is in the same range as PRU (53) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MFC's stock grew similarly to MET’s and similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for MET (96) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for PRU (97) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MFC's stock grew significantly faster than MET’s and significantly faster than PRU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
METMFCPRU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YUMC50.421.76
+3.62%
Yum China Holdings
UGRO1.080.03
+2.86%
urban-gro
ENOV43.950.74
+1.71%
Enovis Corp
AORT28.550.27
+0.95%
Artivion
IKT2.96N/A
N/A
Inhibikase Therapeutics