Advertisement
MET or MFC or PRU
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MET’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PRU’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- MET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PRU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and PRU’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PRU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MET (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +3.33% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.91% , and PRU (@Life/Health Insurance) price fluctuated +1.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
MET is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
MFC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
PRU is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (+0.50% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| MET | MFC | PRU | |
| Capitalization | 58B | 68.4B | 39.1B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 15.835 | 13.258 | 2.547 |
| P/E Ratio | 17.43 | 16.81 | 11.60 |
| Revenue | 76B | 53.2B | 63B |
| Total Cash | 121B | 25B | 83.5B |
| Total Debt | 21.1B | 13.4B | 23.1B |
MET | MFC | PRU | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 23 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 38 Fair valued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 9 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 98 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 45 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 43 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRU's Valuation (10) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MET (31) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry, and is in the same range as MFC (38) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU's stock grew similarly to MET’s and similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.
MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (34) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PRU (52) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MFC's stock grew similarly to MET’s and somewhat faster than PRU’s over the last 12 months.
MET's SMR Rating (96) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (98) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry, and is in the same range as PRU (99) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MET's stock grew similarly to MFC’s and similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.
MET's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (45) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry, and is in the same range as PRU (45) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MET's stock grew similarly to MFC’s and similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.
MET's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (43) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PRU (82) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MET's stock grew similarly to MFC’s and somewhat faster than PRU’s over the last 12 months.
| MET | MFC | PRU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 53% | 16 days ago 51% | 22 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 46% |
Advertisement
MET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.
MFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFC has been loosely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFC jumps, then MET could also see price increases.
PRU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRU has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PRU jumps, then MET could also see price increases.