MFG
Price
$4.54
Change
-$0.27 (-5.62%)
Updated
Apr 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.2B
34 days until earnings call
SHFS
Price
$2.22
Change
-$0.10 (-4.31%)
Updated
Apr 10, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.09M
Ad is loading...

MFG vs SHFS

Header iconMFG vs SHFS Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs SHFSBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$4.54
Change-$0.27 (-5.62%)
Volume$93.16K
Capitalization49.2B
SHF Holdings
Price$2.22
Change-$0.10 (-4.31%)
Volume$100
Capitalization53.09M
MFG vs SHFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. SHFS commentary
Apr 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a StrongBuy and SHFS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2025
Stock price -- (MFG: $4.80 vs. SHFS: $2.32)
Brand notoriety: MFG and SHFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 328% vs. SHFS: 462%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $49.2B vs. SHFS: $53.09M
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $49.2B. SHFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $53.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the long-term than SHFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than SHFS.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -11.76% price change this week, while SHFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -26.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SHFS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.85% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($49.2B) has a higher market cap than SHFS($53.1M). MFG has higher P/E ratio than SHFS: MFG (11.31) vs SHFS (3.43). MFG YTD gains are higher at: -1.840 vs. SHFS (-74.239). SHFS has less debt than MFG: SHFS (15.5M) vs MFG (20.53T). MFG has higher revenues than SHFS: MFG (2.88T) vs SHFS (-27.72M).
MFGSHFSMFG / SHFS
Capitalization49.2B53.1M92,655%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.840-74.2392%
P/E Ratio11.313.43330%
Revenue2.88T-27.72M-10,391,476%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt20.53T15.5M132,470,968%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGSHFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBUX88.688.99
+11.28%
Starbucks Corp
ICL6.140.48
+8.48%
ICL Group Ltd
SBLK13.530.87
+6.87%
Star Bulk Carriers Corp
SATX1.98-0.01
-0.50%
SatixFy Communications Ltd
CNDT2.26-0.16
-6.61%
Conduent

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+9.59%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+5.15%
NWG - MFG
51%
Loosely correlated
+9.18%
AMTB - MFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+6.46%
DB - MFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+11.08%
SNV - MFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+11.89%
More

SHFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHFS and UMBF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHFS and UMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHFS
1D Price
Change %
SHFS100%
+4.50%
UMBF - SHFS
26%
Poorly correlated
+8.95%
ABCB - SHFS
25%
Poorly correlated
+8.31%
WAL - SHFS
25%
Poorly correlated
+12.36%
MFG - SHFS
24%
Poorly correlated
+9.59%
FBP - SHFS
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.12%
More