MFG
Price
$6.56
Change
-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
80.54B
56 days until earnings call
UMBF
Price
$120.54
Change
+$1.65 (+1.39%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.03B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs UMBF

Header iconMFG vs UMBF Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs UMBFBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$6.56
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Volume$2.66M
Capitalization80.54B
UMB Financial
Price$120.54
Change+$1.65 (+1.39%)
Volume$421.65K
Capitalization9.03B
MFG vs UMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. UMBF commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Buy and UMBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MFG: $6.56 vs. UMBF: $120.54)
Brand notoriety: MFG and UMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 102% vs. UMBF: 78%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $80.54B vs. UMBF: $9.03B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $80.54B. UMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMBF is a better buy in the long-term than MFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UMBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than UMBF.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.24% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

UMBF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($80.5B) has a higher market cap than UMBF($9.03B). MFG (13.74) and UMBF (13.65) have similar P/E ratio . MFG YTD gains are higher at: 34.151 vs. UMBF (7.981). UMBF has less debt than MFG: UMBF (439M) vs MFG (22.19T). MFG has higher revenues than UMBF: MFG (3.61T) vs UMBF (1.9B).
MFGUMBFMFG / UMBF
Capitalization80.5B9.03B892%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.1517.981428%
P/E Ratio13.7413.65101%
Revenue3.61T1.9B189,800%
Total CashN/A1.09B-
Total Debt22.19T439M5,054,214%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs UMBF: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
UMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6576
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1634
SMR RATING
1..100
111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1746
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UMBF's Valuation (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (72) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (34) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (11) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGUMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WNTR34.310.59
+1.75%
YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF
IGE48.220.01
+0.02%
iShares North American Natural Res ETF
XAUG36.61-0.01
-0.04%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Aug
BLV71.37-0.18
-0.25%
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
MVV69.56-0.20
-0.29%
ProShares Ultra MidCap400

UMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMBF
1D Price
Change %
UMBF100%
+1.39%
FNB - UMBF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
HWC - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
WTFC - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
ONB - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
ASB - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
More