MGA
Price
$47.47
Change
-$0.18 (-0.38%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.36B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MRETF
Price
$7.29
Change
-$0.07 (-0.95%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
529.38M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGA vs MRETF

Header iconMGA vs MRETF Comparison
Open Charts MGA vs MRETFBanner chart's image
Magna International
Price$47.47
Change-$0.18 (-0.38%)
Volume$14.53K
Capitalization13.36B
Martinrea International
Price$7.29
Change-$0.07 (-0.95%)
Volume$500
Capitalization529.38M
MGA vs MRETF Comparison Chart in %
MGA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRETF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGA vs. MRETF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGA is a Hold and MRETF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (MGA: $47.65 vs. MRETF: $7.28)
Brand notoriety: MGA and MRETF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGA: 112% vs. MRETF: 10%
Market capitalization -- MGA: $13.36B vs. MRETF: $529.38M
MGA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $13.36B. MRETF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $529.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMRETF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MRETF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MGA and MRETF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRETF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MRETF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRETF is a better buy in the short-term than MGA.

Price Growth

MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.39% price change this week, while MRETF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGA is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.50% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($13.4B) has a higher market cap than MRETF($529M). MGA has higher P/E ratio than MRETF: MGA (13.05) vs MRETF (6.03). MGA YTD gains are higher at: 19.545 vs. MRETF (16.188). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.83B vs. MRETF (424M). MGA has more cash in the bank: 488M vs. MRETF (160M). MRETF has less debt than MGA: MRETF (1.18B) vs MGA (7.48B). MGA has higher revenues than MRETF: MGA (41.8B) vs MRETF (4.83B).
MGAMRETFMGA / MRETF
Capitalization13.4B529M2,533%
EBITDA3.83B424M903%
Gain YTD19.54516.188121%
P/E Ratio13.056.03217%
Revenue41.8B4.83B865%
Total Cash488M160M305%
Total Debt7.48B1.18B635%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGA vs MRETF: Fundamental Ratings
MGA
MRETF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7731
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
7389
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2839
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (13) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MRETF (23) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MRETF (100) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (73) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MRETF (89) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MRETF (47) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MRETF (39) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGAMRETF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRETF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGTU26.181.85
+7.60%
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF
DBL15.34-0.01
-0.07%
Doubleline Opportunistic Credit Fund
LEAD74.12-0.23
-0.31%
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
DSL11.37-0.05
-0.44%
DOUBLELINE Income SOLUTIONS FUND
BULD24.96-0.26
-1.04%
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Fut ETF

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
-0.31%
LEA - MGA
79%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
VC - MGA
72%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
ALV - MGA
68%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
ADNT - MGA
68%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
BWA - MGA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
More

MRETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRETF and MGA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRETF and MGA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRETF
1D Price
Change %
MRETF100%
-0.88%
MGA - MRETF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
AXL - MRETF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
VLEEY - MRETF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
LIMAF - MRETF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADNT - MRETF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
More