Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGGPX vs RNPFX
MGGPX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts MGGPX vs RNPFX
MGGPX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGGPX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGGPX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGGPX (3.02B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than MGGPX: RNPFX (1.18) vs MGGPX (0.00). MGGPX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: MGGPX (16 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). MGGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MGGPX (11.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGGPX: RNPFX (250) vs MGGPX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. MGGPX (-4.88). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.40 vs. MGGPX (-24.67).
| MGGPX | RNPFX | MGGPX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.45 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.45 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.861 | 4.551 | 129% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.02B | 172B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.88 | 10.51 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.18 | 40.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.67 | 14.40 | -171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.63 | 122.98 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers