MLR
Price
$40.39
Change
-$3.16 (-7.26%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
568.05M
27 days until earnings call
PHIN
Price
$39.71
Change
-$4.23 (-9.63%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.78B
22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MLR vs PHIN

Header iconMLR vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts MLR vs PHINBanner chart's image
Miller Industries
Price$40.39
Change-$3.16 (-7.26%)
Volume$224
Capitalization568.05M
PHINIA
Price$39.71
Change-$4.23 (-9.63%)
Volume$4.27K
Capitalization1.78B
MLR vs PHIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
MLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLR vs. PHIN commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLR is a Hold and PHIN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MLR: $43.55 vs. PHIN: $43.94)
Brand notoriety: MLR and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLR: 100% vs. PHIN: 58%
Market capitalization -- MLR: $568.05M vs. PHIN: $1.78B
MLR [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $568.05M. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MLR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than MLR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLR is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

MLR (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.55% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -4.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -5.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLR is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-5.75% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($1.78B) has a higher market cap than MLR($568M). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than MLR: PHIN (18.24) vs MLR (9.79). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: -8.279 vs. MLR (-33.070). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 433M vs. MLR (93M). PHIN has more cash in the bank: 365M vs. MLR (29.9M). MLR has less debt than PHIN: MLR (60.8M) vs PHIN (864M). PHIN has higher revenues than MLR: PHIN (3.5B) vs MLR (1.15B).
MLRPHINMLR / PHIN
Capitalization568M1.78B32%
EBITDA93M433M21%
Gain YTD-33.070-8.279399%
P/E Ratio9.7918.2454%
Revenue1.15B3.5B33%
Total Cash29.9M365M8%
Total Debt60.8M864M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLR: Fundamental Ratings
MLR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLRPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THCRX26.620.57
+2.19%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth R3
PXSCX15.81N/A
N/A
Impax Small Cap Investor
ICFAX9.13N/A
N/A
ICON Consumer Select Investor
AFNAX24.86N/A
N/A
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth A
BAFWX49.96N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+2.38%
BWA - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
AXL - PHIN
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
THRM - PHIN
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
LEA - PHIN
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
GT - PHIN
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
More