Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLBGX
MNBRX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.70
Change-$0.08 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets514.66M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$38.96
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
MNBRX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLBGX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a StrongBuy and RLBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. MNBRX (515M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLBGX (2.05) vs MNBRX (1.62). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. MNBRX (3.87). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.50 vs. MNBRX (0.16).
| MNBRX | RLBGX | MNBRX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.25 | 508% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.25 | 508% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.724 | 14.715 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 515M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 2.05 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.87 | 10.37 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.32 | 52.60 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.16 | 44.50 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.75 | 80.42 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement