Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLBGX
MNBRX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.66M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$38.74
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
MNBRX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLBGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a Hold and RLBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. MNBRX (440M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLBGX (2.01) vs MNBRX (1.60). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. MNBRX (4.10). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.06 vs. MNBRX (-3.38).
| MNBRX | RLBGX | MNBRX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.25 | 508% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.25 | 508% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.791 | 14.068 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 440M | 264B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 2.01 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.10 | 9.20 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.81 | 41.98 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.38 | 40.06 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.54 | 74.32 | 14% |