Ad is loading...
MNHCX vs RGWBX
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.43
Change+$0.18 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$26.33
Change+$0.25 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RGWBX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 20.8B vs. MNHCX (470M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHCX (0.19) vs RGWBX (0.08). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHCX (15 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). MNHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.61 vs. MNHCX (7.16). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.89 vs. MNHCX (1.11).
| MNHCX | RGWBX | MNHCX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.568 | 22.351 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 470M | 20.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.08 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | 21.61 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.36 | -0.93 | 1,115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.11 | 32.89 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.86 | 71.71 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers