Ad is loading...
MNHCX vs RGWBX
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$23.65
Change+$1.64 (+7.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets399.12M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$22.55
Change+$1.87 (+9.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.55B
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RGWBX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 17.6B vs. MNHCX (399M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHCX (0.21) vs RGWBX (0.00). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHCX (15 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). MNHCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). MNHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.46 vs. RGWBX (-12.30). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.80 vs. MNHCX (-1.17).
| MNHCX | RGWBX | MNHCX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.46 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.46 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.748 | -15.037 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 399M | 17.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.46 | -12.30 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.30 | -7.80 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.17 | 28.80 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.47 | 31.58 | -77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers