Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHCX vs RGWBX
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.76
Change+$0.16 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets460.01M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$25.67
Change+$0.19 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.74B
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. MNHCX (460M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHCX (0.20) vs RGWBX (0.00). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHCX (15 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. MNHCX (2.72). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.59 vs. MNHCX (-0.49).
| MNHCX | RGWBX | MNHCX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.646 | 5.464 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 460M | 21.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.72 | 7.90 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.14 | 25.88 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.49 | 36.59 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.80 | 63.85 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers