Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHCX vs RGWBX
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$26.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets465M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.50
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.63B
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RGWBX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. MNHCX (465M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHCX (0.19) vs RGWBX (0.00). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHCX (16 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.58 vs. MNHCX (2.73). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. MNHCX (-2.01).
| MNHCX | RGWBX | MNHCX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.774 | 12.983 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 465M | 23.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.73 | 14.58 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.31 | 31.07 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.01 | 37.00 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.54 | 76.55 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers