Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHCX vs RGWBX
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$26.56
Change+$0.20 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.72M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.27
Change+$0.29 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.1B
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. MNHCX (467M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHCX (0.19) vs RGWBX (0.00). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHCX (16 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. MNHCX (3.01). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.69 vs. MNHCX (0.64).
| MNHCX | RGWBX | MNHCX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.694 | 12.038 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 467M | 23.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | 11.26 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.72 | 41.20 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.64 | 40.69 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.90 | 74.96 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement