Ad is loading...
MNHCX vs RGWBX
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.63
Change-$0.34 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets470.98M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$24.98
Change-$0.51 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.13B
MNHCX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RGWBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. MNHCX (471M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHCX (0.19) vs RGWBX (0.08). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHCX (15 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). MNHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.18 vs. MNHCX (5.33). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.41 vs. MNHCX (-0.67).
| MNHCX | RGWBX | MNHCX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.767 | 2.629 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 471M | 21.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.08 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.33 | 9.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.07 | 12.72 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.67 | 29.41 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.43 | 61.72 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...