MNODF
Price
$15.00
Change
-$1.53 (-9.26%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SLVM
Price
$59.27
Change
-$3.15 (-5.05%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.54B
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MNODF vs SLVM

Header iconMNODF vs SLVM Comparison
Open Charts MNODF vs SLVMBanner chart's image
Mondi
Price$15.00
Change-$1.53 (-9.26%)
Volume$108
CapitalizationN/A
Sylvamo
Price$59.27
Change-$3.15 (-5.05%)
Volume$348.76K
Capitalization2.54B
MNODF vs SLVM Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNODF vs. SLVM commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNODF is a Hold and SLVM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MNODF: $15.00 vs. SLVM: $62.42)
Brand notoriety: MNODF and SLVM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNODF: 24% vs. SLVM: 61%
Market capitalization -- MNODF: $0 vs. SLVM: $2.54B
MNODF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $0. SLVM’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $2.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNODF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLVM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLVM is a better buy in the long-term than MNODF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLVM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLVM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -9.26% price change this week, while SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -6.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -4.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLVM is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-4.00% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNODF YTD gains are higher at: 8.225 vs. SLVM (-20.557).
MNODFSLVMMNODF / SLVM
CapitalizationN/A2.55B-
EBITDAN/A572M-
Gain YTD8.225-20.557-40%
P/E RatioN/A10.39-
RevenueN/A3.72B-
Total CashN/A220M-
Total DebtN/A959M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNODF: Fundamental Ratings
MNODF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLVM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSUTX57.77N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights Inv
RAFGX41.53N/A
N/A
American Funds AMCAP R6
FBMCX12.39N/A
N/A
Franklin Managed Income C
MMBDX11.50N/A
N/A
MassMutual Balanced A
MLVMX18.93N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Equity R1

MNODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNODF
1D Price
Change %
MNODF100%
N/A
POELF - MNODF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - MNODF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.49%
UPMMY - MNODF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
SLVM - MNODF
7%
Poorly correlated
-8.69%
HLMMF - MNODF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More