MNODF
Price
$14.30
Change
+$0.77 (+5.69%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.06B
SLVM
Price
$42.62
Change
-$0.14 (-0.33%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.72B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNODF vs SLVM

Header iconMNODF vs SLVM Comparison
Open Charts MNODF vs SLVMBanner chart's image
Mondi
Price$14.30
Change+$0.77 (+5.69%)
Volume$344
Capitalization6.06B
Sylvamo
Price$42.62
Change-$0.14 (-0.33%)
Volume$290.19K
Capitalization1.72B
MNODF vs SLVM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNODF vs. SLVM commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNODF is a StrongBuy and SLVM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MNODF: $14.30 vs. SLVM: $42.62)
Brand notoriety: MNODF and SLVM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNODF: 0% vs. SLVM: 68%
Market capitalization -- MNODF: $6.06B vs. SLVM: $1.72B
MNODF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $6.06B. SLVM’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $1.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNODF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLVM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MNODF and SLVM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNODF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNODF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLVM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVM is a better buy in the short-term than MNODF.

Price Growth

MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +5.68% price change this week, while SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -5.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLVM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-1.16% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNODF($6.06B) has a higher market cap than SLVM($1.72B). MNODF has higher P/E ratio than SLVM: MNODF (28.03) vs SLVM (8.20). MNODF YTD gains are higher at: 3.202 vs. SLVM (-44.852). MNODF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 982M vs. SLVM (503M). MNODF has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. SLVM (113M). SLVM has less debt than MNODF: SLVM (813M) vs MNODF (2.81B). MNODF has higher revenues than SLVM: MNODF (7.59B) vs SLVM (3.55B).
MNODFSLVMMNODF / SLVM
Capitalization6.06B1.72B352%
EBITDA982M503M195%
Gain YTD3.202-44.852-7%
P/E Ratio28.038.20342%
Revenue7.59B3.55B214%
Total Cash168M113M149%
Total Debt2.81B813M346%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNODF: Fundamental Ratings
MNODF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
99
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNODFSLVM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OBIOX24.28N/A
N/A
Oberweis International Opps Inv
NSMAX34.40N/A
N/A
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value A
GGHSX39.52N/A
N/A
Invesco Health Care R6
HKDCAD0.18N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - Canadian Dollar
NZDJPY86.51N/A
N/A
New Zealand Dollar - Japan Yen

MNODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNODF
1D Price
Change %
MNODF100%
+5.68%
POELF - MNODF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - MNODF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - MNODF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
SLVM - MNODF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
HLMMF - MNODF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLVM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVM and MERC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVM and MERC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVM
1D Price
Change %
SLVM100%
-0.33%
MERC - SLVM
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.27%
MAGN - SLVM
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
MATV - SLVM
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
SEOAY - SLVM
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
CLW - SLVM
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
More