MNODF
Price
$11.16
Change
-$0.87 (-7.23%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
4.94B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SLVM
Price
$42.07
Change
+$0.10 (+0.24%)
Updated
Oct 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.69B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNODF vs SLVM

Header iconMNODF vs SLVM Comparison
Open Charts MNODF vs SLVMBanner chart's image
Mondi
Price$11.16
Change-$0.87 (-7.23%)
Volume$188
Capitalization4.94B
Sylvamo
Price$42.07
Change+$0.10 (+0.24%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization1.69B
MNODF vs SLVM Comparison Chart in %
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNODF vs. SLVM commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNODF is a Hold and SLVM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (MNODF: $11.16 vs. SLVM: $41.97)
Brand notoriety: MNODF and SLVM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNODF: 0% vs. SLVM: 58%
Market capitalization -- MNODF: $4.94B vs. SLVM: $1.69B
MNODF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $4.94B. SLVM’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $1.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $13.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNODF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLVM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNODF is a better buy in the long-term than SLVM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNODF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNODF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLVM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNODF is a better buy in the short-term than SLVM.

Price Growth

MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -7.23% price change this week, while SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLVM is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-0.09% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNODF($4.94B) has a higher market cap than SLVM($1.69B). MNODF has higher P/E ratio than SLVM: MNODF (22.27) vs SLVM (8.07). MNODF YTD gains are higher at: -19.481 vs. SLVM (-45.142). MNODF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 982M vs. SLVM (503M). SLVM has less debt than MNODF: SLVM (813M) vs MNODF (2.81B). MNODF has higher revenues than SLVM: MNODF (7.59B) vs SLVM (3.55B).
MNODFSLVMMNODF / SLVM
Capitalization4.94B1.69B292%
EBITDA982M503M195%
Gain YTD-19.481-45.14243%
P/E Ratio22.278.07276%
Revenue7.59B3.55B214%
Total Cash168MN/A-
Total Debt2.81B813M346%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNODF: Fundamental Ratings
MNODF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
99
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNODFSLVM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLGCX9.85N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth C
GQLIX36.36N/A
N/A
GMO Quality I
MTCIX81.51N/A
N/A
MFS Technology I
RPXFX30.03N/A
N/A
RiverPark Large Growth Retail
IWEDX13.97N/A
N/A
Voya Large Cap Value W

MNODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNODF
1D Price
Change %
MNODF100%
N/A
POELF - MNODF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - MNODF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
UPMMY - MNODF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
SLVM - MNODF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
HLMMF - MNODF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLVM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVM and MAGN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVM and MAGN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVM
1D Price
Change %
SLVM100%
-2.55%
MAGN - SLVM
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
MERC - SLVM
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
SUZ - SLVM
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
MATV - SLVM
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.97%
SEOAY - SLVM
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
More