The 50-day moving average for LEA moved below the 200-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LEA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Aroon Indicator for LEA entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 45 of 63 cases where LEA's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on LEA as a result. In 67 of 99 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for LEA just turned positive on October 14, 2026. Looking at past instances where LEA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Following a +0.95% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LEA advanced for three days, in 210 of 322 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 41 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.122) is normal, around the industry mean (0.879). P/E Ratio (10.865) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.808). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.358) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.026) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.271) is also within normal values, averaging (49.084).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. LEA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 67 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LEA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
PHIN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 14 of 18 cases where PHIN's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PHIN's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 8 of 11 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 23 of 30 cases where PHIN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PHIN just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where PHIN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 24 of 33 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Following a +3.69% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PHIN advanced for three days, in 159 of 215 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PHIN as a result. In 32 of 55 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PHIN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
The Aroon Indicator for PHIN entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 42 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.359) is normal, around the industry mean (0.879). P/E Ratio (16.014) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.808). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.021) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.658) is also within normal values, averaging (49.084).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PHIN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PHIN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
LEA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LEA | PHIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 53% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PHIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +2.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.64%.
LEA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
PHIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with SMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then SMP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHIN | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| SMP - PHIN | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| LEA - PHIN | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| MGA - PHIN | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| DORM - PHIN | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| LKQ - PHIN | 51% Loosely correlated | +5.10% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VALG | 13.49 | N/A | N/A |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF (VALG) | |||
| RAAY | 103.35 | N/A | N/A |
| Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA Clo Annual ETF | |||
| HOLA | 55.16 | -0.31 | -0.56% |
| JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) | |||
| GFLW | 32.06 | -0.83 | -2.52% |
| VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) | |||
| PXI | 64.61 | -1.90 | -2.85% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) | |||