Advertisement
LEA vs PHIN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEA is a StrongBuy and PHIN is a Hold.
| LEA | PHIN | LEA / PHIN | |
| Capitalization | 6.45B | 2.43B | 266% |
| EBITDA | 1.44B | 441M | 326% |
| Gain YTD | 16.192 | 6.987 | 232% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.18 | 18.98 | 64% |
| Revenue | 23.7B | 3.62B | 656% |
| Total Cash | 1B | 370M | 271% |
| Total Debt | 2.75B | 1.06B | 259% |
LEA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LEA | PHIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 9 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 38% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LEA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.87% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -4.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
LEA is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
PHIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.25% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMOP | 51.76 | 0.58 | +1.13% |
| AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | |||
| IQDY | 43.62 | 0.34 | +0.78% |
| Northern Trust Intl Qual Div Dyn ETF | |||
| BSEP | 53.94 | 0.30 | +0.57% |
| Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF-Sep | |||
| QDIV | 39.58 | 0.20 | +0.51% |
| Global X S&P 500® Quality Dividend ETF | |||
| ROBN | 33.13 | -0.41 | -1.22% |
| T-Rex 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | |||
PHIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with SMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then SMP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHIN | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| SMP - PHIN | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| THRM - PHIN | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| VC - PHIN | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| DORM - PHIN | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| LEA - PHIN | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More | ||||