Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MPEMX vs RNWHX
MPEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MPEMX vs RNWHX
Mondrian Emerging Markets Value Equity
Price$8.90
Change-$0.03 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.56M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.24
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.3B
MPEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MPEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.3B vs. MPEMX (21.6M). MPEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MPEMX (2.77) vs RNWHX (0.99). MPEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MPEMX (18 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MPEMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MPEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MPEMX (50000). MPEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.87 vs. RNWHX (11.38). MPEMX return over 5 years is better than : 42.78 vs. RNWHX (29.23).
| MPEMX | RNWHX | MPEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.72 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.72 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.839 | 16.219 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.6M | 70.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 0.99 | 280% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.87 | 11.38 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.35 | 41.17 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.78 | 29.23 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement