Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MPEMX vs RNWHX
MPEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MPEMX vs RNWHX
Mondrian Emerging Markets Value Equity
Price$9.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.56M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
MPEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MPEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. MPEMX (22.6M). MPEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MPEMX (2.51) vs RNWHX (0.93). MPEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MPEMX (18 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MPEMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MPEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MPEMX (50000). MPEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.97 vs. RNWHX (15.49). MPEMX return over 5 years is better than : 43.53 vs. RNWHX (29.20).
| MPEMX | RNWHX | MPEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.72 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.72 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.664 | 24.494 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6M | 74.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 0.93 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.97 | 15.49 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.21 | 57.44 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.53 | 29.20 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement