It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MPT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXRN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MPT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XRN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
MPT (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -6.42% price change this week, while XRN (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -2.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.99%.
MPT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
XRN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| MPT | XRN | MPT / XRN | |
| Capitalization | 2.68B | 464M | 577% |
| EBITDA | 947M | 82.9M | 1,142% |
| Gain YTD | -6.967 | 6.690 | -104% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1B | 151M | 662% |
| Total Cash | 257M | 6.78M | 3,792% |
| Total Debt | 9.77B | 677M | 1,442% |
MPT | XRN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MPT's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as XRN (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MPT’s stock grew similarly to XRN’s over the last 12 months.
XRN's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPT (100) in the null industry. This means that XRN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPT’s over the last 12 months.
MPT's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as XRN (93) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MPT’s stock grew similarly to XRN’s over the last 12 months.
XRN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MPT (60) in the null industry. This means that XRN’s stock grew similarly to MPT’s over the last 12 months.
XRN's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MPT (100) in the null industry. This means that XRN’s stock grew similarly to MPT’s over the last 12 months.
| MPT | XRN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPT has been loosely correlated with CHCT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPT jumps, then CHCT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XRN has been loosely correlated with UDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XRN jumps, then UDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XRN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XRN | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| UDR - XRN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| STAG - XRN | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| IRT - XRN | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| ESS - XRN | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| DBRG - XRN | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||