Advertisement
MPT vs UHT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPT is a StrongBuy and UHT is a StrongBuy.
| MPT | UHT | MPT / UHT | |
| Capitalization | 2.17B | 562M | 387% |
| EBITDA | 1.05B | 68.4M | 1,541% |
| Gain YTD | -22.625 | 7.089 | -319% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 29.06 | - |
| Revenue | 1.02B | 99.3M | 1,026% |
| Total Cash | 257M | 6.82M | 3,769% |
| Total Debt | 9.8B | 395M | 2,481% |
MPT | UHT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 29 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MPT's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as UHT (8) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MPT’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.
MPT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as UHT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MPT’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.
UHT's SMR Rating (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MPT (91) in the null industry. This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to MPT’s over the last 12 months.
UHT's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MPT (75) in the null industry. This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to MPT’s over the last 12 months.
UHT's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPT (100) in the null industry. This means that UHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPT’s over the last 12 months.
| MPT | UHT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 69% | 11 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 9 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 51% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MPT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while UHT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MPT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UHT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MPT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MPT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UHT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
MPT (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -7.08% price change this week, while UHT (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -1.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
MPT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
UHT is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-1.02% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
Advertisement
MPT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPT has been loosely correlated with HR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPT jumps, then HR could also see price increases.