Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MRFGX vs RGACX
MRFGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MRFGX vs RGACX
MRFGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRFGX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRFGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MRFGX (3.87B). MRFGX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MRFGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MRFGX (16 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MRFGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MRFGX (29.00). MRFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MRFGX (100) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. MRFGX (-12.13). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. MRFGX (-29.70).
| MRFGX | RGACX | MRFGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.93 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.93 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.310 | 6.959 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.87B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.13 | 3.68 | -330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.18 | 37.13 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.70 | 13.46 | -221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.35 | 97.58 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement