MRT
Price
$1.85
Change
+$0.10 (+5.71%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
159M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PDFS
Price
$46.09
Change
-$0.06 (-0.13%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.93B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRT vs PDFS

MRT vs PDFS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRT vs. PDFS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRT is a StrongBuy and PDFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MRT: $1.85 vs. PDFS: $46.09)
Brand notoriety: MRT and PDFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRT: 47% vs. PDFS: 66%
Market capitalization -- MRT: $159M vs. PDFS: $1.93B
MRT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $159M. PDFS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $400.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePDFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PDFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRT is a better buy in the long-term than PDFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PDFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRT is a better buy in the short-term than PDFS.

Price Growth

MRT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.76% price change this week, while PDFS (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2026.

PDFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.35% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDFS($1.93B) has a higher market cap than MRT($159M). PDFS YTD gains are higher at: 61.549 vs. MRT (-21.941).
MRTPDFSMRT / PDFS
Capitalization159M1.93B8%
EBITDAN/A30M-
Gain YTD-21.94161.549-36%
P/E RatioN/A256.06-
RevenueN/A231M-
Total CashN/A31.2M-
Total DebtN/A72M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRT vs PDFS: Fundamental Ratings
MRT
PDFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2152
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
10089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRT's Valuation (8) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDFS (93) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew significantly faster than PDFS’s over the last 12 months.

PDFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.

PDFS's SMR Rating (89) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

PDFS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MRT (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

PDFS's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRTPDFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PDFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUD12.370.70
+6.00%
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares
INRO35.860.32
+0.89%
iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Act ETF
PFDE27.820.25
+0.89%
Pathfinder Disciplined US Equity ETF
FMF50.190.15
+0.30%
First Trust Managed Future Strategy ETF
USXF66.140.12
+0.18%
iShares® ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF

MRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRT has been loosely correlated with CYN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRT jumps, then CYN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRT
1D Price
Change %
MRT100%
+5.71%
CYN - MRT
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
HCAT - MRT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
PAR - MRT
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
PDFS - MRT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
DCBO - MRT
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
More

PDFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDFS has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDFS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDFS
1D Price
Change %
PDFS100%
-0.13%
SNPS - PDFS
62%
Loosely correlated
+4.41%
S - PDFS
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.59%
MSFT - PDFS
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.02%
FFIV - PDFS
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.55%
NTCT - PDFS
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
More