MS
Price
$147.65
Change
-$0.37 (-0.25%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
236.29B
51 days until earnings call
NCPL
Price
$2.08
Change
-$0.01 (-0.48%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MS vs NCPL

Header iconMS vs NCPL Comparison
Open Charts MS vs NCPLBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$147.65
Change-$0.37 (-0.25%)
Volume$24.78K
Capitalization236.29B
NETCAPITAL
Price$2.08
Change-$0.01 (-0.48%)
Volume$267
Capitalization9.86M
MS vs NCPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. NCPL commentary
Aug 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a StrongBuy and NCPL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2025
Stock price -- (MS: $148.02 vs. NCPL: $2.09)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. NCPL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 128% vs. NCPL: 38%
Market capitalization -- MS: $236.29B vs. NCPL: $9.86M
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $236.29B. NCPL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $9.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNCPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • NCPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than NCPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NCPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NCPL is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.34% price change this week, while NCPL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.53% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($236B) has a higher market cap than NCPL($9.87M). MS YTD gains are higher at: 20.302 vs. NCPL (0.481). MS has more cash in the bank: 4.29B vs. NCPL (614K). NCPL has less debt than MS: NCPL (2.42M) vs MS (352B). MS has higher revenues than NCPL: MS (61.5B) vs NCPL (813K).
MSNCPLMS / NCPL
Capitalization236B9.87M2,392,296%
EBITDAN/A-10.28M-
Gain YTD20.3020.4814,223%
P/E Ratio16.76N/A-
Revenue61.5B813K7,564,576%
Total Cash4.29B614K699,186%
Total Debt352B2.42M14,545,455%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs NCPL: Fundamental Ratings
MS
NCPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3781
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
596
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1265
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MS's Valuation (29) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (81) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (96) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (65) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

MS's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSNCPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EKSO3.550.20
+5.97%
Ekso Bionics Holdings Inc
MYE16.600.61
+3.81%
Myers Industries
HAFN5.980.10
+1.70%
Hafnia Limited
BAP255.013.90
+1.55%
Credicorp Ltd
TARA3.110.01
+0.32%
Protara Therapeutics

NCPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCPL has been loosely correlated with DNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NCPL jumps, then DNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCPL
1D Price
Change %
NCPL100%
+3.47%
DNB - NCPL
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LAZ - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.19%
MCO - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
MS - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
JEF - NCPL
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.73%
More