MS
Price
$162.29
Change
+$2.46 (+1.54%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
257.93B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCHW
Price
$92.64
Change
+$0.36 (+0.39%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
164.62B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MS vs SCHW

Header iconMS vs SCHW Comparison
Open Charts MS vs SCHWBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$162.29
Change+$2.46 (+1.54%)
Volume$6.41M
Capitalization257.93B
Charles Schwab Corp (The)
Price$92.64
Change+$0.36 (+0.39%)
Volume$6.19M
Capitalization164.62B
MS vs SCHW Comparison Chart in %
MS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCHW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. SCHW commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Hold and SCHW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (MS: $162.29 vs. SCHW: $92.64)
Brand notoriety: MS and SCHW are both notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 113% vs. SCHW: 68%
Market capitalization -- MS: $257.93B vs. SCHW: $164.62B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $257.93B. SCHW’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $164.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SCHW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than SCHW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCHW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the short-term than SCHW.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while SCHW (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -8.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

SCHW is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-8.20% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($258B) has a higher market cap than SCHW($165B). SCHW has higher P/E ratio than MS: SCHW (21.70) vs MS (16.65). MS YTD gains are higher at: 32.703 vs. SCHW (26.705). SCHW has less debt than MS: SCHW (37.7B) vs MS (352B). MS has higher revenues than SCHW: MS (61.5B) vs SCHW (22.9B).
MSSCHWMS / SCHW
Capitalization258B165B156%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.70326.705122%
P/E Ratio16.6521.7077%
Revenue61.5B22.9B269%
Total Cash4.29BN/A-
Total Debt352B37.7B934%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs SCHW: Fundamental Ratings
MS
SCHW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1138
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6380
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MS's Valuation (29) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (32). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (38). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (5). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (54). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

MS's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (80). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSSCHW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCHW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CARZ73.410.16
+0.23%
First Trust S-Network Fut Vhcl&Tech ETF
BIV78.03-0.04
-0.05%
Vanguard Interm-Term Bond ETF
AVES57.44-0.15
-0.26%
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
CURE107.10-0.59
-0.55%
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3X ETF
BPH58.28-0.76
-1.29%
BP PLC ADRHEDGED BPH

SCHW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHW has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHW jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHW
1D Price
Change %
SCHW100%
+0.39%
RJF - SCHW
72%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
MS - SCHW
70%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
GS - SCHW
68%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
LPLA - SCHW
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
SF - SCHW
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
More