MSBB
Price
$14.85
Change
+$0.25 (+1.71%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
NSTS
Price
$12.10
Change
-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
50.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSBB vs NSTS

Header iconMSBB vs NSTS Comparison
Open Charts MSBB vs NSTSBanner chart's image
Mercer Ban
Price$14.85
Change+$0.25 (+1.71%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
NSTS Ban
Price$12.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Volume$100
Capitalization50.71M
MSBB vs NSTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSBB vs. NSTS commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSBB is a Hold and NSTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MSBB: $14.85 vs. NSTS: $12.15)
Brand notoriety: MSBB and NSTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSBB: 33% vs. NSTS: 18%
Market capitalization -- MSBB: $0 vs. NSTS: $50.71M
MSBB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. NSTS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $50.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNSTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MSBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSBB is a better buy in the long-term than NSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSBB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSBB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NSTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSBB is a better buy in the short-term than NSTS.

Price Growth

MSBB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.71% price change this week, while NSTS (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSBB YTD gains are higher at: 6.071 vs. NSTS (2.966).
MSBBNSTSMSBB / NSTS
CapitalizationN/A50.7M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.0712.966205%
P/E RatioN/A175.44-
RevenueN/A4.95M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A32.8M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSBBNSTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DYLG26.180.03
+0.12%
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & GrowthETF
TDTF24.15-0.03
-0.10%
FlexShares iBoxx 5Yr Target Dur TIPS ETF
RSP182.86-0.41
-0.22%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF
DHY2.12N/A
-0.23%
Credit Suisse High Yield
FMED23.13-0.40
-1.69%
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF

MSBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSBB and FNWD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSBB and FNWD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSBB
1D Price
Change %
MSBB100%
N/A
FNWD - MSBB
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
BKIMF - MSBB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - MSBB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCAP - MSBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
NSTS - MSBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More

NSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with FULTP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then FULTP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSTS
1D Price
Change %
NSTS100%
-0.33%
FULTP - NSTS
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
FGBIP - NSTS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
PFIS - NSTS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
SMBK - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
HBCP - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More