MSFU and TECL represent two leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from the same issuer that target technology exposure through different mechanisms. They do not compete directly but offer alternative strategies for investors seeking amplified daily returns within the technology sector. MSFU focuses on a single prominent company, while TECL provides broader sector participation. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions to assist investors evaluating thematic leverage options amid ongoing technology sector dynamics.
MSFU seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the daily performance of the common shares of Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). As a single-stock leveraged ETF, it maintains effectively one primary holding. The fund employs a passive leveraged strategy with daily reset mechanics to achieve its target multiple. Its expense ratio is 0.98%. MSFU distinguishes itself through concentrated exposure to (MSFT) fundamentals, including its software, cloud, and hardware segments, without additional diversification.
TECL seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. The fund holds approximately 70 securities, with top positions typically concentrated in leading technology firms. It follows a passive leveraged approach with daily rebalancing. TECL carries an expense ratio of 0.87%. Its structure provides leveraged participation across the broader technology sector, encompassing software, hardware, semiconductors, and related industries.
The technology sector continues to experience capital allocation driven by advancements in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and semiconductor demand. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and corporate capital expenditure cycles influence flows into technology assets. Regulatory developments around data privacy and antitrust scrutiny represent ongoing considerations. Both ETFs operate within this environment, where sector momentum and earnings growth from key participants serve as primary performance drivers. Leveraged products amplify sensitivity to these trends while introducing additional volatility from daily resets.
In recent market cycles, the single-stock focus of MSFU has aligned its returns closely with (MSFT) earnings reports and product announcements, leading to distinct volatility patterns compared to the broader index underlying TECL. TECL’s 3x leverage and diversified holdings have positioned it to capture sector-wide rotations more comprehensively, though with greater sensitivity to index constituent movements. Relative positioning reflects differences in concentration risk and leverage magnitude, with both ETFs exhibiting amplified responses to technology earnings seasons and macroeconomic shifts versus unleveraged benchmarks.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to TECL due to its broader diversification across the technology sector, slightly lower expense ratio, and higher leverage multiple aligned with sector momentum characteristics. MSFU offers precise exposure to (MSFT) but carries elevated concentration risk. Investors should evaluate these attributes against their specific risk tolerance and objectives.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| MSFU | TECL | MSFU / TECL | |
| Gain YTD | -7.912 | 88.104 | -9% |
| Net Assets | 701M | 6.37B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.87 | 113% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 94.00 | - |
| Yield | 2.06 | 0.17 | 1,194% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
| MSFU | TECL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KOLD | 30.11 | 1.57 | +5.50% |
| ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natrl Gas | |||
| DTCR | 29.05 | 0.36 | +1.25% |
| Global X Data Center & Dgtl Infrs ETF | |||
| CDL | 81.01 | 0.85 | +1.06% |
| VictoryShares US LgCp Hi Div Vol Wtd ETF | |||
| SEPM | 33.19 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Sep | |||
| IVSI | 28.99 | N/A | N/A |
| Applied Finance IVS International Large ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSFU has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSFU jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSFU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFU | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| MSFT - MSFU | 99% Closely correlated | +0.90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TECL has been loosely correlated with GLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TECL jumps, then GLW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TECL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TECL | 100% | +3.05% | ||
| GLW - TECL | 65% Loosely correlated | -5.32% | ||
| KEYS - TECL | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| ANET - TECL | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| APH - TECL | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| HPE - TECL | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
More | ||||