Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSHOX vs RGAGX
MSHOX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MSHOX vs RGAGX
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$13.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.36M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.57
Change+$0.46 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
MSHOX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSHOX vs. RGAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSHOX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. MSHOX (5.36M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than RGAGX: MSHOX (1.10) vs RGAGX (0.56). MSHOX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MSHOX (6 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: RGAGX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. MSHOX (2.36). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.91 vs. MSHOX (-3.80).
| MSHOX | RGAGX | MSHOX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.30 | 650% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 13.89 | 0.30 | 4,630% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.776 | 16.123 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.36M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.56 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | 7.34 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.50 | 64.06 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.80 | 35.91 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement