MTB
Price
$217.49
Change
-$0.07 (-0.03%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
31.84B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNC
Price
$219.21
Change
-$0.47 (-0.21%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
89.23B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTB vs PNC

MTB vs PNC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) vs. The PNC Financial Services Group (PNC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both MTB and PNC delivered second-quarter 2026 earnings beats driven by higher net interest income (NII, the difference between interest earned on loans and paid on deposits) and stronger fee income.
  • M&T Bank is a disciplined regional franchise concentrated in the Mid-Atlantic, while PNC is a national super-regional with a significantly larger balance sheet and capital-markets reach.
  • PNC's recent revenue growth has been amplified by its FirstBank acquisition, while M&T Bank's gains reflect organic loan growth and improving credit quality.
  • M&T Bank trades at a premium valuation to peers, whereas PNC offers a lower price-to-earnings multiple with a higher dividend yield.
  • Relative momentum has favored M&T Bank in recent months, but both stocks face margin and expense pressures that temper forward estimates.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines two prominent U.S. banking franchises: M&T Bank Corporation and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Both are well-capitalized commercial banks with diversified revenue streams, yet they differ sharply in scale, geographic footprint, and growth strategy. For investors evaluating regional and super-regional bank stocks, the contrast between MTB and PNC offers a useful lens on relative performance, market positioning, and risk. The comparison is particularly relevant to those weighing a disciplined, balance-sheet-focused operator against a larger franchise pursuing acquisition-driven expansion and capital-markets growth.

MTB Overview and Recent Performance

MTB, or M&T Bank Corporation, is a financial holding company headquartered in Buffalo, New York, with a banking network spanning the eastern U.S. from Maine to Virginia and Washington, D.C. Its franchise was substantially expanded through the 2022 acquisition of People's United. In recent market activity, M&T Bank shares rallied roughly 20% over a three-month stretch, outperforming the broader S&P 500 and several regional peers, though the stock later pulled back from its record high.

Second-quarter 2026 results reinforced the positive tone: net operating earnings per share (EPS) of $5.35 beat consensus estimates, net income rose 15% year over year, and revenues climbed 5.7% on higher NII and fee income. Credit metrics improved, with net charge-offs declining and non-performing assets falling. The company's efficiency ratio improved to 52.8%, and its Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio remained solid at roughly 10.2%. Sentiment has been supported by strong loan growth, share repurchases, and analysts highlighting potential for a "beat-and-raise" on NII, though expense growth and a full valuation remain areas of scrutiny.

PNC Overview and Recent Performance

PNC, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., is a national super-regional bank headquartered in Pittsburgh with one of the largest branch networks in the U.S. and a meaningful presence in corporate and institutional banking, asset management, and capital markets. Its scale grew further with the roughly $4.1 billion acquisition of FirstBank, completed in early 2026, which expanded its footprint into Colorado and Arizona.

In the second quarter of 2026, PNC posted record quarterly revenue of $6.88 billion, up 21.4% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $4.85 exceeding estimates. NII rose 15.5% and its net interest margin (NIM) expanded to 2.96%, while capital markets and advisory revenue surged nearly 80%. The bank also raised its quarterly dividend 18%. However, shares dipped after the report as investors weighed a sequential decline in deposits, higher expenses, and integration costs. Management has reaffirmed its outlook, citing resilient consumer spending and momentum in commercial lending, while signaling a likely return to NIM above 3% by year-end.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a systematic, data-driven approach to stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's artificial-intelligence trading agents. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that monitor thousands of tickers, but only the strategies best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this rotating selection. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance, and the set of tickers they trade, with reported metrics such as win rates, profit factors, and annualized returns. For example, featured agents span short-interval strategies across sectors like investment banks, semiconductors, and AI infrastructure, with some displaying annualized returns well above 50%. Exploring the Trending AI Robots section can help investors identify strategies aligned with their own time horizon and risk tolerance.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most visible contrast is scale. PNC's balance sheet is roughly two and a half times larger than M&T Bank's, with average loans around $363 billion versus approximately $141 billion for MTB. This scale gives PNC deeper capital-markets, treasury-management, and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) advisory capabilities, which drove its outsized fee-income growth. M&T Bank, by comparison, leans more heavily on traditional commercial and consumer lending and trust services through its Wilmington Trust unit.

On growth drivers, PNC's expansion is increasingly acquisition- and fee-led, while M&T Bank's is more organic, rooted in loan repricing and disciplined underwriting. On risk, PNC carries a slightly lower CET1 ratio (about 9.9%) than M&T Bank, reflecting capital deployed toward the FirstBank deal and buybacks. On valuation and sentiment, M&T Bank trades at a premium forward multiple to peers, whereas PNC offers a lower price-to-earnings ratio and a higher dividend yield. Both face margin compression and expense growth as shared headwinds.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and near-term catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely tilt modestly toward MTB. Its steadier uptrend, improving credit quality, rising efficiency, and potential for a "beat-and-raise" on NII suggest a more consistent, less event-dependent setup than PNC, whose near-term story is more closely tied to FirstBank integration costs and deposit dynamics. That said, PNC's stronger fee diversification and dividend growth make it a competitive alternative, and any single verdict is inherently probabilistic rather than definitive.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MTB vs. PNC commentary
Oct 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTB is a Hold and PNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs PNC: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
PNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7769
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3262
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4851
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTB's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNC (50) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to PNC’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNC (62) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to PNC’s over the last 12 months.

PNC's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PNC’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNC (58) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to PNC’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNC (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to PNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTBPNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2026
Stock price -- (MTB: $217.49 vs. PNC: $219.21)
Brand notoriety: MTB: Not notable vs. PNC: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 73% vs. PNC: 69%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $31.84B vs. PNC: $89.23B
MTB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.84B. PNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $89.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the long-term than PNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the short-term than PNC.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.75% price change this week, while PNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

PNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
MTB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZS233.7316.92
+7.80%
Zscaler
ENPH32.81-0.10
-0.30%
Enphase Energy
THFF72.79-1.12
-1.52%
First Financial Corp
AREC1.59-0.06
-3.64%
American Resources Corp
NEON0.84-0.04
-4.78%
Neonode

PNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNC has been closely correlated with USB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNC jumps, then USB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNC
1D Price
Change %
PNC100%
-0.21%
USB - PNC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
MTB - PNC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
KEY - PNC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
FITB - PNC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
HBAN - PNC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
More