Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MTCBX vs PRGTX
MTCBX vs PRGTX Comparison
Open Charts MTCBX vs PRGTX
MTCBX vs PRGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MTCBX vs. PRGTX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTCBX is a Buy and PRGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 8.4B vs. MTCBX (2.41B). MTCBX (0.00) and PRGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . MTCBX was incepted earlier than PRGTX: MTCBX (26 years) vs PRGTX (26 years). MTCBX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.93). MTCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. PRGTX (34.60). MTCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGTX: MTCBX (1000) vs PRGTX (2500). PRGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.68 vs. MTCBX (4.73). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : 15.28 vs. MTCBX (-22.27).
| MTCBX | PRGTX | MTCBX / PRGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.93 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.93 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.979 | 34.991 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 8.4B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 54.68 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.81 | 144.14 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.27 | 15.28 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.99 | 159.15 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement