MUFG
Price
$13.59
Change
-$0.04 (-0.29%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
116.09B
26 days until earnings call
SAN
Price
$8.58
Change
-$0.30 (-3.38%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
76.74B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MUFG vs SAN

Header iconMUFG vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts MUFG vs SANBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$13.59
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
Volume$28.1K
Capitalization116.09B
Banco Santander SA
Price$8.58
Change-$0.30 (-3.38%)
Volume$6.98K
Capitalization76.74B
MUFG vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MUFG vs. SAN commentary
Jul 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUFG is a StrongBuy and SAN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2025
Stock price -- (MUFG: $13.63 vs. SAN: $8.58)
Brand notoriety: MUFG and SAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MUFG: 60% vs. SAN: 77%
Market capitalization -- MUFG: $116.09B vs. SAN: $76.74B
MUFG [@Major Banks] is valued at $116.09B. SAN’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $76.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MUFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MUFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAN is a better buy in the long-term than MUFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUFG’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MUFG’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAN is a better buy in the short-term than MUFG.

Price Growth

MUFG (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.16% price change this week, while SAN (@Major Banks) price change was +0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

SAN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.54% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUFG($116B) has a higher market cap than SAN($76.7B). MUFG has higher P/E ratio than SAN: MUFG (8.85) vs SAN (6.83). SAN YTD gains are higher at: 94.445 vs. MUFG (15.956). SAN has less debt than MUFG: SAN (311B) vs MUFG (48.64T). MUFG has higher revenues than SAN: MUFG (5.66T) vs SAN (59.9B).
MUFGSANMUFG / SAN
Capitalization116B76.7B151%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.95694.44517%
P/E Ratio8.856.83130%
Revenue5.66T59.9B9,447%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt48.64T311B15,640%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUFG vs SAN: Fundamental Ratings
MUFG
SAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1617
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
133
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7118
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAN's Valuation (65) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (69). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (13). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (2). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (50). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUFG (71). This means that SAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUFGSAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
48%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VONE284.620.85
+0.30%
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
ZAUG25.87-0.01
-0.03%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrAug
FLHY24.18-0.01
-0.04%
Franklin High Yield Corporate ETF
XHYF37.78-0.07
-0.18%
BondBloxx US Hg Yld Fncl & REIT Str ETF
FJP58.79-0.45
-0.75%
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX® ETF

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
-0.29%
SMFG - MUFG
91%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
C - MUFG
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
HSBC - MUFG
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
BCS - MUFG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
UBS - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
More

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
-3.38%
BBVA - SAN
78%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
ING - SAN
75%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
HSBC - SAN
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
BCS - SAN
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
MUFG - SAN
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
More