MVST
Price
$0.81
Change
+$0.01 (+1.25%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
268.89M
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QS
Price
$5.22
Change
-$0.01 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
3.21B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MVST vs QS

MVST vs QS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MVST vs. QS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVST is a Hold and QS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MVST: $0.81 vs. QS: $5.22)
Brand notoriety: MVST and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MVST: 92% vs. QS: 77%
Market capitalization -- MVST: $268.89M vs. QS: $3.21B
MVST [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $268.89M. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $72.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MVST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MVST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the long-term than MVST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MVST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MVST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MVST and QS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MVST (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.87% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +6.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

MVST is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.79% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.21B) has a higher market cap than MVST($269M). QS YTD gains are higher at: -49.904 vs. MVST (-71.175). MVST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.95M vs. QS (-336.7M). QS has more cash in the bank: 859M vs. MVST (126M). QS has less debt than MVST: QS (67.1M) vs MVST (326M). MVST has higher revenues than QS: MVST (372M) vs QS (0).
MVSTQSMVST / QS
Capitalization269M3.21B8%
EBITDA-9.95M-336.7M3%
Gain YTD-71.175-49.904143%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue372M0-
Total Cash126M859M15%
Total Debt326M67.1M486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MVST vs QS: Fundamental Ratings
MVST
QS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9486
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QS's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as MVST (65). This means that QS’s stock grew similarly to MVST’s over the last 12 months.

QS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MVST (100). This means that QS’s stock grew similarly to MVST’s over the last 12 months.

MVST's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as QS (98). This means that MVST’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

QS's Price Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MVST (94). This means that QS’s stock grew similarly to MVST’s over the last 12 months.

MVST's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as QS (100). This means that MVST’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MVSTQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MVST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRGF76.100.54
+0.71%
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
XOCT39.800.08
+0.19%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Oct
ZMAR28.350.03
+0.12%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrMar
PLOO13.83N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF
QMOM73.74-0.31
-0.42%
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-0.19%
SLDP - QS
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
SES - QS
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+6.56%
AUR - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
INVZ - QS
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
More