MVST saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 05, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 78 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 71 of the 78 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for MVST turned negative on October 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 43 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MVST declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for MVST entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 14 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 15 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 26 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.352) is normal, around the industry mean (0.879). P/E Ratio (3.106) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.808). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.565) is also within normal values, averaging (49.084).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 66 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MVST’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MVST’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
QS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 31 of 36 cases where QS's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where QS's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 24 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QS just turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where QS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
Following a +1.75% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QS advanced for three days, in 197 of 238 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Aroon Indicator for QS entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 31 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.436) is normal, around the industry mean (0.879). P/E Ratio (-6.194) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.808). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (49.084).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. QS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
MVST | QS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MVST's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as QS (31). This means that MVST’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.
MVST's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QS (100). This means that MVST’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.
MVST's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as QS (97). This means that MVST’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.
QS's Price Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MVST (92). This means that QS’s stock grew similarly to MVST’s over the last 12 months.
QS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MVST (86). This means that QS’s stock grew significantly faster than MVST’s over the last 12 months.
| MVST | QS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MVST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while QS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MVST’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MVST (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -12.47% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.71%.
MVST is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
QS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2027.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UTRE | 48.46 | 0.21 | +0.44% |
| US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF (UTRE) | |||
| JPLD | 51.61 | 0.13 | +0.25% |
| JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) | |||
| FEBM | 31.79 | -0.05 | -0.14% |
| FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF-February (FEBM) | |||
| DDFL | 21.66 | -0.11 | -0.49% |
| Innovator July Trust Units (DDFL) | |||
| DFVX | 85.03 | -0.55 | -0.65% |
| Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) | |||