Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MWCPX vs PUBAX
MWCPX vs PUBAX Comparison
Open Charts MWCPX vs PUBAX
MWCPX vs PUBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MWCPX vs. PUBAX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWCPX is a Hold and PUBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MWCPX has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. PUBAX (2.2B). PUBAX pays higher dividends than MWCPX: PUBAX (5.17) vs MWCPX (4.88). MWCPX was incepted earlier than PUBAX: MWCPX (6 years) vs PUBAX (18 years). PUBAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than MWCPX (0.69). PUBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 824.00 vs. MWCPX (254.00). PUBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWCPX: PUBAX (1000) vs MWCPX (25000000). PUBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.46 vs. MWCPX (4.34). PUBAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.04 vs. MWCPX (13.35).
| MWCPX | PUBAX | MWCPX / PUBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.19 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.24 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.106 | 0.931 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000000 | 1000 | 2,500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 2.2B | 120% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.88 | 5.17 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.34 | 5.46 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.90 | 21.93 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.35 | 15.04 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement