Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MWOFX vs NPFFX
MWOFX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts MWOFX vs NPFFX
MFS Global Growth A
Price$64.01
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.86M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$71.74
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
MWOFX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MWOFX vs. NPFFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWOFX is a Hold and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. MWOFX (896M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: NPFFX (0.43) vs MWOFX (0.01). MWOFX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: MWOFX (32 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). NPFFX (24.00) and MWOFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: NPFFX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.68 vs. MWOFX (-2.12). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.94 vs. MWOFX (15.00).
| MWOFX | NPFFX | MWOFX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.78 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.78 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.815 | 16.461 | 23% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 896M | 159B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.43 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.12 | 11.68 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.89 | 46.15 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | 26.94 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.94 | 87.67 | 100% |