Ad is loading...
NACP vs RECS
NACP vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts NACP vs RECS
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empwrmt ETF
Price$37.06
Change-$1.49 (-3.87%)
Volume$6.75K
Net Assets52.04M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.00
Change-$1.12 (-3.49%)
Volume$1.29M
Net Assets2.25B
NACP vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NACP vs. RECS commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NACP is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.25B vs. NACP (52M). NACP has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: NACP (-9.119) vs RECS (-10.456). NACP was incepted earlier than RECS: NACP (7 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than NACP (0.49). RECS has a higher turnover NACP (37.00) vs NACP (37.00).
| NACP | RECS | NACP / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -9.119 | -10.456 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 52M | 2.25B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 49.00 | 76% |
| Yield | 2.96 | 0.73 | 408% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
NACP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NACP has been closely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NACP jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NACP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NACP | 100% | -3.88% | ||
| CRH - NACP | 70% Closely correlated | -6.48% | ||
| TFC - NACP | 68% Closely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| NVT - NACP | 68% Closely correlated | -5.01% | ||
| HWM - NACP | 66% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| HAL - NACP | 65% Loosely correlated | -8.16% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -3.49% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -5.17% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.02% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -4.91% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -7.62% | ||
More | ||||