Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NACP vs RECS
NACP vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts NACP vs RECS
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empwrmt ETF
Price$41.10
Change-$0.24 (-0.58%)
Volume$346
Net Assets53.69M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$34.32
Change-$0.22 (-0.64%)
Volume$400
Net Assets2.69B
NACP vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NACP vs. RECS commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NACP is a Buy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.69B vs. NACP (53.7M). NACP has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: NACP (1.383) vs RECS (-0.231). NACP was incepted earlier than RECS: NACP (7 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than NACP (0.49). RECS has a higher turnover NACP (37.00) vs NACP (37.00).
| NACP | RECS | NACP / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.383 | -0.231 | -599% |
| Net Assets | 53.7M | 2.69B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 49.00 | 76% |
| Yield | 3.02 | 0.73 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
NACP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NACP has been closely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NACP jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NACP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NACP | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRH - NACP | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| NVT - NACP | 71% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| TFC - NACP | 71% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| HWM - NACP | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| FITB - NACP | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | N/A | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||