Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NACP vs RECS
NACP vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts NACP vs RECS
NACP vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NACP vs. RECS commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NACP is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 6.03B vs. NACP (75M). NACP has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: NACP (22.364) vs RECS (10.529). NACP was incepted earlier than RECS: NACP (8 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than NACP (0.49). RECS has a higher turnover NACP (24.00) vs NACP (24.00).
| NACP | RECS | NACP / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 22.364 | 10.529 | 212% |
| Net Assets | 75M | 6.03B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 32.00 | 75% |
| Yield | 0.57 | 0.74 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NACP | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
NACP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NACP and MAR have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NACP and MAR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NACP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NACP | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| MAR - NACP | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| BAH - NACP | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| QCOM - NACP | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.01% | ||
| EBAY - NACP | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| FSLR - NACP | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||