Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NACP vs RECS
NACP vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts NACP vs RECS
NACP vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NACP vs. RECS commentary
Oct 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NACP is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NACP | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | about 1 month ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WTMY | 23.93 | 0.09 | +0.38% |
| WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal Fund (WTMY) | |||
| SSPY | 96.44 | 0.33 | +0.34% |
| Stratified LargeCap Index ETF (SSPY) | |||
| TXXI | 48.00 | 0.11 | +0.24% |
| Bondbloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Intermediate Duration ETF | |||
| DFEV | 42.38 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) | |||
| GMF | 155.74 | -0.42 | -0.27% |
| State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) | |||
NACP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NACP and CTAS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NACP and CTAS's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NACP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NACP | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| CTAS - NACP | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| EBAY - NACP | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| PFG - NACP | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| BIIB - NACP | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| MDT - NACP | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +6.22% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| MS - RECS | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| ITT - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||