Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RPMAX
NAESX vs RPMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RPMAX
NAESX vs RPMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RPMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RPMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. RPMAX (717M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RPMAX: NAESX (1.09) vs RPMAX (0.06). NAESX was incepted earlier than RPMAX: NAESX (66 years) vs RPMAX (8 years). RPMAX (1.48) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RPMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMAX: NAESX (0) vs RPMAX (5000). RPMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. NAESX (13.09). RPMAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.41 vs. NAESX (32.77).
| NAESX | RPMAX | NAESX / RPMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.20 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.48 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.982 | 22.429 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185B | 717M | 25,802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.06 | 1,849% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | 14.22 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | 46.23 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | 43.41 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers