Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RPMAX
NAESX vs RPMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RPMAX
NAESX vs RPMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RPMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RPMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. RPMAX (754M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RPMAX: NAESX (1.07) vs RPMAX (0.06). NAESX was incepted earlier than RPMAX: NAESX (66 years) vs RPMAX (8 years). RPMAX (1.48) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RPMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMAX: NAESX (0) vs RPMAX (5000). RPMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.39 vs. NAESX (23.34). RPMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.51 vs. NAESX (38.39).
| NAESX | RPMAX | NAESX / RPMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.20 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.48 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.738 | 26.992 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189B | 754M | 25,066% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.06 | 1,869% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.34 | 25.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.12 | 44.61 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.39 | 52.51 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers