Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RPMFX
NAESX vs RPMFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RPMFX
NAESX vs RPMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RPMFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and RPMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. RPMFX (741M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RPMFX: NAESX (1.10) vs RPMFX (0.11). NAESX was incepted earlier than RPMFX: NAESX (66 years) vs RPMFX (8 years). RPMFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RPMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMFX: NAESX (0) vs RPMFX (5000). RPMFX (25.80) and NAESX (24.75) have marching annual gain over last year. RPMFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.85 vs. NAESX (42.07).
| NAESX | RPMFX | NAESX / RPMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.95 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.23 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.339 | 28.181 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 741M | 24,696% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.11 | 961% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.75 | 25.80 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.17 | 53.75 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | 54.85 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers