Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RPMFX
NAESX vs RPMFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RPMFX
NAESX vs RPMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RPMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and RPMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. RPMFX (713M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RPMFX: NAESX (1.08) vs RPMFX (0.12). NAESX was incepted earlier than RPMFX: NAESX (66 years) vs RPMFX (8 years). RPMFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RPMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMFX: NAESX (0) vs RPMFX (5000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.95 vs. RPMFX (24.66). RPMFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.85 vs. NAESX (33.38).
| NAESX | RPMFX | NAESX / RPMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.95 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.23 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.680 | 19.020 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 713M | 24,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.12 | 893% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.95 | 24.66 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | 44.29 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.38 | 41.85 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement