Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RPMFX
NAESX vs RPMFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RPMFX
NAESX vs RPMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RPMFX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and RPMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. RPMFX (744M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RPMFX: NAESX (1.07) vs RPMFX (0.11). NAESX was incepted earlier than RPMFX: NAESX (66 years) vs RPMFX (8 years). RPMFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RPMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMFX: NAESX (0) vs RPMFX (5000). RPMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. NAESX (21.60). RPMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.48 vs. NAESX (33.43).
| NAESX | RPMFX | NAESX / RPMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.95 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.23 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.636 | 25.509 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189B | 744M | 25,403% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.11 | 948% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.60 | 22.95 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.13 | 48.19 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.43 | 50.48 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement