Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs TRCSX
NAESX vs TRCSX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs TRCSX
NAESX vs TRCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. TRCSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and TRCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. TRCSX (483M). NAESX (1.08) and TRCSX (1.07) have matching dividends . NAESX was incepted earlier than TRCSX: NAESX (66 years) vs TRCSX (11 years). TRCSX (0.26) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). TRCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.90 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCSX: NAESX (0) vs TRCSX (500000). TRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.47 vs. NAESX (27.66). NAESX (33.59) and TRCSX (33.09) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NAESX | TRCSX | NAESX / TRCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.14 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.26 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.348 | 20.708 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 483M | 37,888% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.07 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.66 | 41.47 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.38 | 65.76 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.59 | 33.09 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.93 | 135.79 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement