It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NAVI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNFCA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NAVI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNFCA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NAVI (@Savings Banks) experienced а -5.09% price change this week, while SNFCA (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -4.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.67%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -3.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.80%.
NAVI is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
@Life/Health Insurance (-3.38% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| NAVI | SNFCA | NAVI / SNFCA | |
| Capitalization | 763M | 249M | 306% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -36.388 | 5.993 | -607% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.38 | 7.21 | 560% |
| Revenue | 606M | 342M | 177% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 128M | - |
| Total Debt | 44.6B | 123M | 36,260% |
NAVI | SNFCA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NAVI's Valuation (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNFCA (47) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that NAVI’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNFCA’s over the last 12 months.
SNFCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAVI (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that SNFCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAVI’s over the last 12 months.
NAVI's SMR Rating (67) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SNFCA (86) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that NAVI’s stock grew similarly to SNFCA’s over the last 12 months.
SNFCA's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as NAVI (63) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that SNFCA’s stock grew similarly to NAVI’s over the last 12 months.
NAVI's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNFCA (78) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that NAVI’s stock grew significantly faster than SNFCA’s over the last 12 months.
| NAVI | SNFCA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 60% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 24 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAVI has been loosely correlated with LC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NAVI jumps, then LC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NAVI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAVI | 100% | -4.42% | ||
| LC - NAVI | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.84% | ||
| ALLY - NAVI | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| R - NAVI | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| URI - NAVI | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| AER - NAVI | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
More | ||||