NB
Price
$2.74
Change
+$0.17 (+6.61%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
95.56M
UAMY
Price
$2.63
Change
+$0.10 (+3.95%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
26.91M
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NB vs UAMY

Header iconNB vs UAMY Comparison
Open Charts NB vs UAMYBanner chart's image
NioCorp Developments
Price$2.74
Change+$0.17 (+6.61%)
Volume$873.69K
Capitalization95.56M
United States Antimony
Price$2.63
Change+$0.10 (+3.95%)
Volume$3.51M
Capitalization26.91M
NB vs UAMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UAMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NB vs. UAMY commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NB is a Hold and UAMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (NB: $2.74 vs. UAMY: $2.63)
Brand notoriety: NB and UAMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NB: 115% vs. UAMY: 97%
Market capitalization -- NB: $95.56M vs. UAMY: $26.91M
NB [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $95.56M. UAMY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $26.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUAMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UAMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UAMY is a better buy in the long-term than NB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UAMY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UAMY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NB is a better buy in the short-term than UAMY.

Price Growth

NB (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.40% price change this week, while UAMY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

NB is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

UAMY is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.22% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NB($95.6M) has a higher market cap than UAMY($26.9M). NB YTD gains are higher at: 76.774 vs. UAMY (48.588). UAMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.16M vs. NB (-35.81M). UAMY has more cash in the bank: 13.1M vs. NB (634K). UAMY has less debt than NB: UAMY (242K) vs NB (5.74M). UAMY has higher revenues than NB: UAMY (8.45M) vs NB (0).
NBUAMYNB / UAMY
Capitalization95.6M26.9M355%
EBITDA-35.81M-3.16M1,135%
Gain YTD76.77448.588158%
P/E RatioN/A98.04-
Revenue08.45M-
Total Cash634K13.1M5%
Total Debt5.74M242K2,370%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NB vs UAMY: Fundamental Ratings
NB
UAMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7582
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1007
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NB's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as UAMY (95) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that NB’s stock grew similarly to UAMY’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for NB (100) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew significantly faster than NB’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's SMR Rating (91) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as NB (100) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to NB’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as NB (38) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to NB’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for NB (100) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew significantly faster than NB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBUAMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UAMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COVTY35.390.16
+0.46%
Covestro AG
FUJIY10.87N/A
N/A
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp.
ARSMF0.22N/A
-0.07%
Ares Strategic Mining Inc
BSRTF13.10-0.05
-0.37%
Bsr Real Estate Invt Tr
VLKAF105.70-1.80
-1.67%
Volkswagen AG

NB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NB and MP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NB and MP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NB
1D Price
Change %
NB100%
+6.61%
MP - NB
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
UAMY - NB
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.95%
WRN - NB
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
IONR - NB
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.36%
SGML - NB
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.88%
More

UAMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UAMY and RGLSF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UAMY and RGLSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UAMY
1D Price
Change %
UAMY100%
+3.95%
RGLSF - UAMY
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.10%
MP - UAMY
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
VZLA - UAMY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
NB - UAMY
29%
Poorly correlated
+6.61%
TECK - UAMY
27%
Poorly correlated
+8.44%
More