NBHC
Price
$42.88
Change
-$0.86 (-1.97%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.96B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TFIN
Price
$74.90
Change
-$0.78 (-1.03%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.8B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBHC vs TFIN

Header iconNBHC vs TFIN Comparison
Open Charts NBHC vs TFINBanner chart's image
NBHC vs TFIN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBHC vs. TFIN commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHC is a StrongBuy and TFIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (NBHC: $43.74 vs. TFIN: $75.68)
Brand notoriety: NBHC and TFIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBHC: 92% vs. TFIN: 96%
Market capitalization -- NBHC: $1.96B vs. TFIN: $1.8B
NBHC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.96B. TFIN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTFIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TFIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBHC is a better buy in the long-term than TFIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFIN is a better buy in the short-term than NBHC.

Price Growth

NBHC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.67% price change this week, while TFIN (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

NBHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

TFIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBHC($1.96B) has a higher market cap than TFIN($1.8B). TFIN has higher P/E ratio than NBHC: TFIN (63.60) vs NBHC (16.32). TFIN YTD gains are higher at: 20.837 vs. NBHC (16.871). NBHC has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. TFIN (84.6M). TFIN has less debt than NBHC: TFIN (143M) vs NBHC (202M). NBHC (436M) and TFIN (428M) have equivalent revenues.
NBHCTFINNBHC / TFIN
Capitalization1.96B1.8B109%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.87120.83781%
P/E Ratio16.3263.6026%
Revenue436M428M102%
Total Cash369M84.6M436%
Total Debt202M143M141%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBHC vs TFIN: Fundamental Ratings
NBHC
TFIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2642
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74100
SMR RATING
1..100
5263
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NBHC's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFIN (98). This means that NBHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFIN (100). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's SMR Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFIN (63). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

TFIN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (46). This means that TFIN’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TFIN (97). This means that NBHC’s stock grew significantly faster than TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBHCTFIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TFIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLLL171.053.38
+2.02%
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
EWA29.220.26
+0.90%
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
EMHC25.390.03
+0.12%
State Street® SPDR® Blmbg EM USD Bd ETF
SSFI21.48-0.01
-0.05%
Day Hagan Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF
EAI19.97-0.08
-0.37%
Entergy Arkansas LLC

NBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with CATY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then CATY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBHC
1D Price
Change %
NBHC100%
+1.96%
CATY - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
PEBO - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
FCF - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
PRK - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
WSBC - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
More

TFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFIN has been loosely correlated with OBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TFIN jumps, then OBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFIN
1D Price
Change %
TFIN100%
+1.39%
OBK - TFIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
BANR - TFIN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
NBHC - TFIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
FHB - TFIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
FULT - TFIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
More