NEM
Price
$56.50
Change
+$0.23 (+0.41%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
5 days until earnings call
SGNLF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

NEM vs SGNLF

Header iconNEM vs SGNLF Comparison
Open Charts NEM vs SGNLFBanner chart's image
Newmont
Price$56.50
Change+$0.23 (+0.41%)
Volume$5.02M
CapitalizationN/A
SIGNAL GOLD
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.02K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
NEM vs SGNLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
NEM vs. SGNLF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEM is a StrongBuy and SGNLF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NEM: $56.50 vs. SGNLF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: NEM: Notable vs. SGNLF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NEM: 70% vs. SGNLF: 77%
Market capitalization -- NEM: $42B vs. SGNLF: $41.39M
NEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $42B. SGNLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $41.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NEM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGNLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SGNLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than SGNLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.81% price change this week, while SGNLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($42B) has a higher market cap than SGNLF($41.4M). NEM YTD gains are higher at: 39.083 vs. SGNLF (-41.220). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 320M vs. SGNLF (4.64M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 3.03B vs. SGNLF (16.2M). SGNLF has less debt than NEM: SGNLF (20.7M) vs NEM (9.44B). NEM has higher revenues than SGNLF: NEM (11.8B) vs SGNLF (41.6M).
NEMSGNLFNEM / SGNLF
Capitalization42B41.4M101,449%
EBITDA320M4.64M6,904%
Gain YTD39.083-41.220-95%
P/E Ratio36.25N/A-
Revenue11.8B41.6M28,365%
Total Cash3.03B16.2M18,673%
Total Debt9.44B20.7M45,585%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEM vs SGNLF: Fundamental Ratings
NEM
SGNLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7612
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
9394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEM's Valuation (12) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SGNLF (29) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGNLF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (93) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SGNLF (94) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGNLF (63) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGNLF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

SGNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGNLF and NEM have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGNLF and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGNLF
1D Price
Change %
SGNLF100%
-8.02%
NEM - SGNLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
FTBYF - SGNLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.74%
KDKGF - SGNLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
SVM - SGNLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
VMSXF - SGNLF
13%
Poorly correlated
-7.00%
More