NEM
Price
$37.62
Change
-$2.18 (-5.48%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
63 days until earnings call
SGNLF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

NEM vs SGNLF

Header iconNEM vs SGNLF Comparison
Open Charts NEM vs SGNLFBanner chart's image
Newmont
Price$37.62
Change-$2.18 (-5.48%)
Volume$128.27K
CapitalizationN/A
SIGNAL GOLD
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$39K
CapitalizationN/A
NEM vs SGNLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NEM vs. SGNLF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEM is a Hold and SGNLF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (NEM: $37.64 vs. SGNLF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: NEM: Notable vs. SGNLF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NEM: 146% vs. SGNLF: 82%
Market capitalization -- NEM: $42B vs. SGNLF: $41.39M
NEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $42B. SGNLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $41.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NEM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGNLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SGNLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than SGNLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGNLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SGNLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the short-term than SGNLF.

Price Growth

NEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.97% price change this week, while SGNLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($42B) has a higher market cap than SGNLF($41.4M). NEM YTD gains are higher at: -1.443 vs. SGNLF (-39.512). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 320M vs. SGNLF (4.64M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 3.03B vs. SGNLF (16.2M). SGNLF has less debt than NEM: SGNLF (20.7M) vs NEM (9.44B). NEM has higher revenues than SGNLF: NEM (11.8B) vs SGNLF (41.6M).
NEMSGNLFNEM / SGNLF
Capitalization42B41.4M101,449%
EBITDA320M4.64M6,904%
Gain YTD-1.443-39.5124%
P/E Ratio36.25N/A-
Revenue11.8B41.6M28,365%
Total Cash3.03B16.2M18,673%
Total Debt9.44B20.7M45,585%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEM vs SGNLF: Fundamental Ratings
NEM
SGNLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
9093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEM's Valuation (12) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SGNLF (40) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SGNLF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (90) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SGNLF (93) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SGNLF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (62) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SGNLF’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGNLF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew significantly faster than SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEMSGNLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPS62.93-0.24
-0.38%
WisdomTree US Earnings 500 ETF
RAAX28.28-0.63
-2.19%
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
SPYV51.29-1.25
-2.38%
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
MFDX29.56-0.78
-2.56%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor Intl Eq ETF
CRAK28.68-0.79
-2.69%
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with GOLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then GOLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
-0.70%
GOLD - NEM
72%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
AEM - NEM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
RGLD - NEM
70%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
WPM - NEM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
KGC - NEM
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
More

SGNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGNLF and NEM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGNLF and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGNLF
1D Price
Change %
SGNLF100%
N/A
NEM - SGNLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.43%
FTBYF - SGNLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
STPGF - SGNLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
SVM - SGNLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.19%
KDKGF - SGNLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-11.11%
More