Advertisement
NEM vs WPM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Newmont Corporation (NEM) vs. Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- NEM is the world’s largest gold producer with integrated mining operations, while WPM operates as a precious metals streaming company with lower operational risk and higher profit margins.
- Both stocks have delivered strong year-to-date gains amid elevated gold prices, with NEM showing approximately 59% one-year total return and WPM around 44% over the same period.
- Recent market activity reflects volatility tied to Federal Reserve policy shifts, including a September 2026 rate hike that briefly pressured gold prices before a rebound.
- NEM reported record second-quarter free cash flow and resolved key disputes with Barrick Gold, supporting operational stability.
- WPM posted record first-half revenues with reaffirmed 2026 production guidance and consistently superior net margins near 65%.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs between NEM’s scale and production growth versus WPM’s capital-light model and margin resilience.
Introduction
Investors and traders focused on the precious metals sector often compare established gold miners with streaming and royalty companies to assess differing risk-return profiles. NEM (Newmont Corporation) and WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.) represent these distinct approaches within the same commodity exposure. This comparison appeals to those evaluating relative performance, business model resilience, and positioning amid fluctuating gold prices and macroeconomic developments. Market participants seeking balanced insights into operational leverage versus margin stability may find the analysis particularly relevant in the current environment.
NEM Overview and Recent Performance
Newmont Corporation is the world’s largest gold producer, operating mines across multiple continents with additional exposure to copper and other metals. In recent weeks, NEM shares have traded near $123 on the NYSE, reflecting a one-year gain of approximately 59% driven by higher realized gold prices and operational efficiencies. The company delivered strong second-quarter results, including record free cash flow of $2.2 billion and production in line with full-year guidance. Sentiment received support from the resolution of long-standing disputes with Barrick Gold over the Nevada Gold Mines joint venture. Recent Federal Reserve interest rate actions introduced short-term volatility in gold prices, influencing near-term price behavior, though broader market activity has remained constructive for the sector.
WPM Overview and Recent Performance
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. functions as a leading precious metals streaming company, providing upfront capital to miners in exchange for future metal deliveries at fixed prices. WPM shares have recently traded near $151, posting roughly 44% gains over the past year amid rising gold and silver prices. The company reported record first-half 2026 revenues of $1.8 billion, an 88% year-over-year increase, alongside reaffirmed production guidance of 860,000 to 940,000 gold equivalent ounces for the full year. Performance has benefited from high-margin streaming contracts and contributions from assets such as Antamina. Like its peers, WPM experienced price fluctuations tied to macroeconomic signals, including the recent Federal Reserve policy shift, yet maintained steady relative positioning within the sector.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a dedicated Trending AI Robots page that curates the most suitable AI trading bots for prevailing market conditions. While hundreds of AI trading bots are available across thousands of tickers, only those demonstrating strong alignment with current trends, risk parameters, and performance metrics earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles, with many showing win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics that can be reviewed directly on the platform. This resource allows traders to explore automated approaches tailored to equities such as those in the precious metals space. Review the Trending AI Robots page for detailed bot specifications and historical results.
Head-to-Head Comparison
NEM operates a capital-intensive mining model with direct exposure to production costs, geopolitical risks, and reserve depletion, whereas WPM employs a streaming model that generates high margins (net margins near 65%) with reduced operational overhead. Growth drivers differ accordingly: NEM benefits from mine expansions and by-product credits, while WPM leverages existing streams and new deals for scalable output without additional mining capex. Recent momentum has favored both amid gold price strength, though NEM recorded a larger one-year advance. Risk factors include NEM’s sensitivity to all-in sustaining costs and labor issues versus WPM’s counterparty and volume delivery risks. Sector exposure remains aligned with gold and silver, yet market sentiment often rewards WPM for its capital-light profile during periods of commodity volatility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, margin stability, and recent catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models may currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to WPM due to its resilient streaming economics and elevated profit margins relative to traditional mining operations. NEM retains competitive positioning through scale and resolved operational uncertainties. Any assessment remains subject to evolving market conditions and should be evaluated alongside individual risk tolerance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEM is a Hold and WPM is a StrongBuy.
NEM | WPM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WPM's Valuation (47) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (76). This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (35). This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's SMR Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (41). This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (49). This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WPM (92). This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than WPM’s over the last 12 months.
| NEM | WPM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 78% | 24 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while WPM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WPM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- WPM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
NEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.47% price change this week, while WPM (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -6.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
WPM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-6.14% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
Advertisement
NEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEM | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| KGC - NEM | 88% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| WPM - NEM | 87% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| AEM - NEM | 87% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| CGAU - NEM | 86% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| RGLD - NEM | 85% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
More | ||||
WPM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WPM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WPM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WPM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPM | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| AEM - WPM | 93% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| FNV - WPM | 90% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| KGC - WPM | 90% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| RGLD - WPM | 90% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PAAS - WPM | 90% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||