NEM
Price
$95.76
Change
+$4.42 (+4.84%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
100.9B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WPM
Price
$113.38
Change
+$3.92 (+3.58%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
51.09B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NEM vs WPM

NEM vs WPM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Newmont Corporation (NEM) vs. Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Newmont Corporation (NEM) operates as a major gold and copper producer with direct exposure to mining operations, while Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) functions as a streaming company that finances production in exchange for future metal deliveries at predetermined prices.
  • Over recent weeks, NEM has shown more pronounced volatility tied to its Q2 2026 earnings release on July 23, which highlighted robust results and full-year guidance achievement, contrasting with WPM's steadier positioning ahead of its Q2 results scheduled for August 6.
  • Valuation metrics indicate NEM trades at a lower price-to-earnings ratio compared to WPM, alongside a larger market capitalization and higher reported EBITDA in available data.
  • Both stocks benefit from precious metals sector dynamics, yet NEM carries higher operational and cost-related risks inherent to active mining, whereas WPM offers relatively lower capital expenditure exposure through its streaming model.
  • Year-to-date performance reflects mixed results for both, with broader one-year returns favoring NEM in several comparative analyses amid fluctuating gold prices.
  • Market sentiment remains influenced by macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and metal demand, with neither stock displaying clear dominance in recent relative momentum.

Introduction

Investors and traders seeking exposure to the precious metals sector often evaluate producers alongside streaming entities to balance operational leverage against more predictable cash-flow models. Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) represent these distinct approaches within the gold and broader metals space. This comparison examines their business structures, recent price behavior, and market positioning to assist those assessing relative value, risk profiles, and sector trends. The analysis draws on verifiable performance data and developments from recent market activity, providing a neutral framework relevant for portfolio allocation decisions in the current environment.

NEM Overview and Recent Performance

Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the world’s largest gold producer with significant copper operations. Its business involves active mining, exploration, and production across multiple jurisdictions. In recent weeks, the stock has experienced volatility, with movements influenced by its second-quarter 2026 earnings release on July 23, which confirmed robust results and progress toward full-year guidance. Year-to-date returns remain negative amid broader sector fluctuations, while one-year performance shows notable gains. Sentiment has been shaped by gold price movements and operational updates, with the company maintaining a larger scale compared to peers in terms of market capitalization and earnings metrics.

WPM Overview and Recent Performance

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) specializes in precious metals streaming, providing upfront capital to mining partners in return for a portion of future production at fixed prices. This model reduces direct operational risks relative to traditional miners. In recent weeks, the stock has traded with relative stability ahead of its second-quarter 2026 results, expected after market close on August 6. Year-to-date performance reflects modest positive returns, supported by strong prior-quarter cash flows and record metrics reported earlier in the year. Market activity has been driven by precious metals pricing and analyst commentary on valuation, positioning the company with a focus on lower capital intensity.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a much larger pool of hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers across varied market conditions, yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current trends, strategies, and statistical performance earn placement in this focused section. Available bots feature diverse trading styles, timeframes, risk parameters, and historical performance ranges, allowing users to explore options suited to different objectives. The platform emphasizes data-driven selection without favoring any single approach. For more details on these curated tools, visit Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) differ fundamentally in business models, with NEM engaged in full-cycle mining operations that expose it to production costs, regulatory factors, and commodity price swings, while WPM employs a streaming approach that generates revenue from metal deliveries with reduced direct expenses. Growth drivers for NEM center on operational execution and reserve expansion, whereas WPM benefits from portfolio diversification across partners and long-term contracts. Recent momentum shows NEM with more earnings-related catalysts, contrasted by WPM’s steadier profile. Risk factors include higher leverage to input costs for NEM versus counterparty and metal price dependency for WPM. Both maintain sector exposure to precious metals, though valuation data points to NEM at comparatively lower multiples alongside larger scale.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, one-year return differentials, valuation positioning, and upcoming earnings catalysts, Tickeron’s AI currently assigns a higher probability of favorable near-term performance to Newmont Corporation (NEM) relative to Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). This assessment reflects comparative stability in certain metrics and positioning rather than definitive outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NEM vs. WPM commentary
Jul 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEM is a StrongBuy and WPM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 31, 2026
Stock price -- (NEM: $95.76 vs. WPM: $113.38)
Brand notoriety: NEM and WPM are both notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NEM: 101% vs. WPM: 66%
Market capitalization -- NEM: $100.9B vs. WPM: $51.09B
NEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $100.9B. WPM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $51.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWPM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WPM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WPM is a better buy in the long-term than NEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the short-term than WPM.

Price Growth

NEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.10% price change this week, while WPM (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -24.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

WPM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.93% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($101B) has a higher market cap than WPM($51.1B). WPM has higher P/E ratio than NEM: WPM (28.65) vs NEM (12.08). WPM YTD gains are higher at: -3.226 vs. NEM (-3.678). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. WPM (2.4B). NEM has more cash in the bank: 8.78B vs. WPM (2.17B). WPM has less debt than NEM: WPM (7.66M) vs NEM (5.53B). NEM has higher revenues than WPM: NEM (25B) vs WPM (2.75B).
NEMWPMNEM / WPM
Capitalization101B51.1B198%
EBITDA16.2B2.4B676%
Gain YTD-3.678-3.226114%
P/E Ratio12.0828.6542%
Revenue25B2.75B910%
Total Cash8.78B2.17B405%
Total Debt5.53B7.66M72,200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEM vs WPM: Fundamental Ratings
NEM
WPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6819
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5342
SMR RATING
1..100
3743
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4197
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WPM's Valuation (38) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (62). This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (53). This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (43). This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (59). This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WPM (97). This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than WPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEMWPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EGHA10.33N/A
N/A
Egh Acquisition Corp
CIGI99.38-1.78
-1.76%
Colliers International Group
VRTS163.50-4.29
-2.56%
Virtus Investment Partners
TULP3.26-0.09
-2.69%
Bloomia Holdings Inc.
RELX36.61-1.62
-4.24%
Relx PLC

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
+4.84%
KGC - NEM
88%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
AEM - NEM
87%
Closely correlated
+4.38%
WPM - NEM
85%
Closely correlated
+3.58%
GFI - NEM
84%
Closely correlated
+4.00%
PAAS - NEM
84%
Closely correlated
+3.48%
More

WPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WPM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WPM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WPM
1D Price
Change %
WPM100%
+3.58%
AEM - WPM
92%
Closely correlated
+4.38%
KGC - WPM
90%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
PAAS - WPM
89%
Closely correlated
+3.48%
OR - WPM
89%
Closely correlated
+4.07%
FNV - WPM
88%
Closely correlated
+3.26%
More