Advertisement
AEM vs NEM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) vs. Newmont (NEM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Newmont (NEM) has delivered stronger one-year returns of approximately 118% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines' (AEM) 69%, driven by robust earnings and elevated gold prices.
- NEM trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 15 versus AEM's 23, indicating potentially better relative valuation.
- In recent weeks, NEM gained about 17% over the past month, outpacing AEM's 4% rise amid gold price volatility.
- NEM, with a larger market cap of $124 billion, reported record Q1 free cash flow (FCF) of $3.1 billion, bolstering its financial position.
- Both stocks exhibit low volatility with betas below 0.8, but AEM benefits from recent strategic acquisitions in Finland.
- Analysts maintain buy ratings on both, reflecting positive sector sentiment tied to gold's strength.
Introduction
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) and Newmont (NEM) stand as leading gold producers, making them prime candidates for comparison in today's market. Both companies operate extensive mining portfolios and capitalize on sustained high gold prices, which have driven sector gains. Investors seeking exposure to precious metals amid economic uncertainty, inflation hedges, or commodity cycles will find this analysis valuable. Traders focused on relative performance, valuation metrics, and momentum shifts can gauge which stock aligns better with current conditions. This head-to-head review highlights key differences in scale, recent momentum, and risk profiles without favoring one over the other.
AEM Overview and Recent Performance
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) is a Toronto-based gold producer with operations in Canada, Australia, Finland, and Mexico. The company explores and produces gold alongside silver, copper, and zinc. In recent market activity, AEM shares have traded around $200, within a 52-week range of $103 to $255, reflecting gold's influence. Year-to-date (YTD) gains stand at about 18%, with a modest 4% rise over the past month amid gold price fluctuations and profit-taking. Sentiment has been shaped by strategic moves, including $3 billion acquisitions consolidating the Central Lapland Greenstone Belt in Finland, enhancing long-term reserves. Upcoming earnings are anticipated to show growth, though broader metal price dips have pressured shares downward in recent weeks.
NEM Overview and Recent Performance
Newmont (NEM), headquartered in Denver, is the world's largest gold miner with global assets producing gold, copper, silver, and other metals across the Americas, Africa, Australia, and Papua New Guinea. Shares recently closed near $116, in a 52-week range of $49 to $135, with a market cap exceeding $124 billion. YTD performance is around 16%, but the past month saw a strong 17% advance. Key drivers include record Q1 results with $7.31 billion in revenue and $3.1 billion in FCF, fueled by gold averaging nearly $4,900 per ounce. Recent gold pullbacks have led to some consolidation, yet share repurchase expansions and debt reduction have supported positive investor sentiment in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available—specifically, 25 best selected out of 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies, including swing trading, scalping, and long-term trend following, across various timeframes from intraday to multi-month holds. Performance stats vary widely, with win rates often ranging from 60-80% and profitability metrics highlighting consistent returns in volatile markets. Some focus on sectors like precious metals, adapting to conditions such as gold rallies. Traders can explore these bots' historical statistics, risk-adjusted returns, and traded tickers to match their style. Visit Trending AI Robots to discover options suited to current environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business models, NEM's larger scale and diversification into copper provide broader revenue streams versus AEM's focused gold operations. Growth drivers differ: NEM leverages record cash flows for buybacks, while AEM pursues acquisitions for reserve expansion. Recent momentum favors NEM with superior monthly and annual gains, though both track gold trends closely. Risk factors include commodity price sensitivity, with NEM's lower beta (0.47) offering slightly more stability than AEM's (0.70). Sector exposure is pure-play gold for both, but NEM's global footprint hedges geopolitical risks better. Market sentiment remains bullish, with NEM's valuation edge contrasting AEM's growth premium.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward NEM based on stronger trend consistency, recent earnings catalysts, lower valuation multiples, and superior momentum in recent market activity. Factors like record FCF generation and share repurchases position it favorably relative to AEM, though gold price stability remains key for both. This probabilistic edge reflects observable data rather than guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and NEM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
NEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (+1.32% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AEM | NEM | AEM / NEM | |
| Capitalization | 81.4B | 107B | 76% |
| EBITDA | 9.74B | 16.2B | 60% |
| Gain YTD | -3.656 | 0.819 | -447% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.31 | 13.00 | 118% |
| Revenue | 13.5B | 25B | 54% |
| Total Cash | 3.12B | 8.78B | 36% |
| Total Debt | 319M | 5.53B | 6% |
AEM | NEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NEM's Valuation (60) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (93) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (57) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's SMR Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (43) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (62) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (90) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 61% |
Advertisement