Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM) represent two of the largest publicly traded gold mining companies, making them natural points of comparison for investors seeking exposure to the precious metals sector. This analysis examines their business profiles, recent price behavior, and relative positioning amid fluctuating commodity prices and operational developments. The comparison is particularly relevant for traders monitoring gold-related equities, portfolio managers allocating to resources, and those evaluating momentum or value opportunities within the mining industry. Both stocks offer insights into how producers navigate high gold prices, cost pressures, and production targets in a dynamic market.
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) operates as a senior gold producer with a diversified portfolio of mines primarily in Canada, Australia, and other regions. The company focuses on low-cost, long-life assets and has maintained a strong balance sheet with net cash positions exceeding $2.9 billion following robust first-quarter 2026 results driven by higher realized gold prices. In recent weeks, AEM shares have faced downward pressure, declining around 7% over the past month amid broader market activity and specific operational notes, including a reported rock mass movement at one of its open pits with no injuries or environmental impact. Upcoming second-quarter results on July 29 are expected to provide updated production guidance and margin details, influencing sentiment in the near term.
Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the world’s largest gold producer by output, with operations spanning multiple continents and a focus on sustainable mining practices alongside growth projects. The company delivered record quarterly earnings and free cash flow in the first quarter of 2026, supported by strong production and cost discipline. In recent market activity, NEM shares have exhibited mixed performance, with some sessions showing outperformance relative to broader indices amid gold price strength, though the stock has also experienced periodic pullbacks. The upcoming second-quarter earnings release on July 23 will likely highlight any shifts in production volumes, costs, and capital allocation, including share repurchase activity, serving as a focal point for investor assessment.
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that highlights select AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds of bots trading thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions—such as consistent trend following, volatility management, or sector-specific strategies—earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of performance metrics, with historical win rates often falling between 55% and 75% depending on timeframe and strategy, alongside varying drawdown profiles and trade frequencies. Each bot employs distinct approaches, including different time horizons from intraday to multi-week and unique combinations of technical indicators or machine learning models. This resource allows traders to explore automated strategies suited to stocks like those in the gold mining sector. Explore the full selection at the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and backtested results.
In terms of business model, Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) emphasizes high-margin, lower-risk jurisdictions with a focus on operational efficiency at key sites, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) leverages greater scale and geographic diversification, which can provide broader exposure but also introduces more variables in execution. Growth drivers for both center on gold price realization and production optimization, though NEM’s larger asset base offers more potential for volume increases alongside its share repurchase program. Recent momentum has favored NEM in certain periods according to comparative analyses, with stronger one-year returns noted in some metrics, whereas AEM has shown resilience in margins but faced localized operational headwinds. Risk factors include commodity price sensitivity for both, with AEM potentially more exposed to specific mine-level issues and NEM to integration or regulatory matters across its portfolio. Market sentiment remains constructive for the gold sector overall, supported by macroeconomic factors, though near-term technical indicators have pointed to consolidation phases for both equities.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent sessions, earnings visibility ahead of quarterly releases, and relative positioning within the gold producers group, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to Newmont Corporation (NEM) for near-term consideration. This assessment draws from NEM’s demonstrated ability to exceed market returns in select periods and its scale advantages, though outcomes remain contingent on upcoming earnings delivery and sustained gold price levels. Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) continues to show competitive fundamentals that could support outperformance under different scenarios, underscoring the value of monitoring both equities closely.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.77%.
AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
NEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AEM | NEM | AEM / NEM | |
| Capitalization | 74.4B | 101B | 74% |
| EBITDA | 9.74B | 16.2B | 60% |
| Gain YTD | -11.718 | -4.633 | 253% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.03 | 12.30 | 114% |
| Revenue | 13.5B | 25B | 54% |
| Total Cash | 3.12B | 8.78B | 36% |
| Total Debt | 319M | 5.53B | 6% |
AEM | NEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NEM's Valuation (58) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (92) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (60) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's SMR Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (42) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (64) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (90) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 64% |