Advertisement
AEM vs NEM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) vs. Newmont (NEM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AEM and NEM are leading gold producers with global operations, though NEM maintains a larger scale and market capitalization.
- Recent market activity shows NEM with relatively stronger year-to-date performance compared to AEM, which has faced steeper declines amid sector pressures.
- AEM benefits from a leaner balance sheet with lower debt levels, while NEM demonstrates robust free cash flow generation and reaffirmed full-year guidance following its second-quarter results.
- Both companies exhibit sensitivity to gold prices and operational execution risks, with recent sentiment influenced by earnings outlooks and macroeconomic factors affecting precious metals demand.
- Market positioning highlights trade-offs between AEM’s focused operational profile and NEM’s broader diversification and shareholder return initiatives.
- Relative momentum in recent weeks favors stability in earnings delivery, with neither stock showing decisive technical dominance in short-term signals.
Introduction
Investors and traders frequently compare AEM and NEM due to their prominent positions in the gold mining sector. Both companies offer exposure to gold price movements and operate extensive international portfolios, making the pair relevant for those seeking precious metals equities. This analysis appeals to portfolio managers evaluating sector allocation, momentum traders monitoring relative performance, and long-term investors assessing operational resilience and capital return strategies within the materials industry. The comparison emphasizes verifiable fundamentals, recent price behavior, and positioning without forward-looking speculation.
AEM Overview and Recent Performance
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is a major gold producer with operations primarily in Canada, Australia, Finland, and Mexico. The company focuses on high-quality assets and has maintained a disciplined approach to costs and production. In recent market activity, shares have traded around the $145 level following broader sector pullbacks, with year-to-date declines exceeding those of some peers. Key influences include anticipation of second-quarter 2026 results scheduled for late July, prior dividend increases, and renewal of a share repurchase program. Sentiment has reflected mixed analyst target adjustments alongside recognition of record operating margins from earlier quarters and a strong balance sheet. Performance in recent weeks has been shaped by gold price volatility and operational updates at key sites.
NEM Overview and Recent Performance
Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the world’s largest gold mining company by production, with a diversified portfolio spanning multiple continents and additional exposure to copper. The firm emphasizes operational efficiency and capital discipline. Recent market activity shows shares near the $93 level after reporting second-quarter 2026 results, which highlighted robust free cash flow and reaffirmed full-year guidance. Influences on performance include the earnings release demonstrating production levels near 1.3 million attributable gold ounces and ongoing shareholder returns through dividends and buybacks. Sentiment in recent weeks has been supported by execution consistency despite cost pressures, contributing to relatively steadier positioning compared to some sector counterparts amid fluctuating metal prices.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform’s extensive library of AI trading bots. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers across varied market conditions. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing trends, consistent risk-adjusted metrics, and suitability for current environments are featured in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, allowing users to review detailed historical data and ticker-specific signals. This curated approach helps market participants identify tools that match their objectives. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AEM and NEM share core exposure to gold prices yet differ in scale and financial structure. NEM operates with greater revenue generation and market capitalization, while AEM maintains a leaner balance sheet with reduced debt. Recent momentum has favored NEM on a year-to-date basis, although both have faced sector headwinds from commodity price movements. Risk factors include commodity price sensitivity and operational execution in remote locations for each. Market sentiment remains tied to macroeconomic influences on gold demand, with neither company showing decisive technical outperformance in short-term signals. Trade-offs center on NEM’s broader diversification versus AEM’s potentially more focused operational profile and lower leverage.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in earnings delivery, balance sheet stability, and relative positioning within the gold sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to NEM. This reflects stronger recent free cash flow metrics and guidance reaffirmation alongside steadier year-to-date performance compared with AEM’s steeper recent declines, though both remain subject to broader market variables.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a StrongBuy and NEM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.32% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -24.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (+0.93% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AEM | NEM | AEM / NEM | |
| Capitalization | 75.8B | 101B | 75% |
| EBITDA | 9.74B | 16.2B | 60% |
| Gain YTD | -10.699 | -3.678 | 291% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.91 | 12.08 | 107% |
| Revenue | 13.5B | 25B | 54% |
| Total Cash | 3.12B | 8.78B | 36% |
| Total Debt | 319M | 5.53B | 6% |
AEM | NEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 17 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NEM's Valuation (62) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (94) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (54) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's SMR Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (42) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (62) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (95) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 10 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 63% |
Advertisement
AEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
NEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.