Advertisement
NIC vs SMLV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIC is a Hold and SMLV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NIC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NIC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- NIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NIC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.98% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
NIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.33% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
NIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| NIC | SMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 60% | 18 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BTMPX | 18.93 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx Inv P | |||
| PABYX | 17.45 | N/A | N/A |
| Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y | |||
| IRVIX | 26.19 | N/A | N/A |
| Voya Russell Large Cap Value Idx Port I | |||
| EIPTX | 15.03 | N/A | N/A |
| UBS Engage For Impact P2 | |||
| EPSYX | 25.21 | -0.08 | -0.32% |
| NYLI Epoch Global Equity Yield Class I | |||
NIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIC has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIC jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIC | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| EFSC - NIC | 86% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| STBA - NIC | 86% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| TCBK - NIC | 85% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| MBWM - NIC | 85% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| PEBO - NIC | 85% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||
SMLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMLV has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMLV jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMLV | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| FMBH - SMLV | 91% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| MCBS - SMLV | 89% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| NIC - SMLV | 87% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| BFC - SMLV | 87% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| OBK - SMLV | 86% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||