Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGACX
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGACX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$36.89
Change-$0.15 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets850.77M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.35
Change-$0.63 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NLCCX (851M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). NLCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. RGACX (7.09). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.44 vs. NLCCX (-16.25).
| NLCCX | RGACX | NLCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.94 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.94 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.815 | 18.558 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 851M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 7.09 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.51 | 60.09 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.25 | 30.44 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.60 | 89.90 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement