Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGACX
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGACX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$35.87
Change-$0.21 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.35M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.84
Change-$0.41 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NLCCX (849M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGACX (16.17) and NLCCX (15.79) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.01 vs. NLCCX (-8.38).
| NLCCX | RGACX | NLCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.94 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.94 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.294 | 17.850 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 849M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.79 | 16.17 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.31 | 60.87 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.38 | 46.01 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.63 | 99.93 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers