Ad is loading...
NLCCX vs RGAFX
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAFX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$32.37
Change-$1.29 (-3.83%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$74.83
Change-$9.91 (-11.69%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 313B vs. NLCCX (816M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAFX (0.73) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NLCCX (27 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGAFX (31.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.65 vs. NLCCX (31.69). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.90 vs. NLCCX (-4.29).
| NLCCX | RGAFX | NLCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.973 | 34.273 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 816M | 313B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.73 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.69 | 35.65 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.45 | 19.24 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.29 | 56.90 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.94 | 99.89 | 19% |