Ad is loading...
NLCCX vs RGAFX
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAFX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$27.21
Change-$1.09 (-3.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets699.46M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$66.13
Change-$2.72 (-3.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. NLCCX (699M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAFX (0.66) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.74 vs. NLCCX (-3.48). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.56 vs. NLCCX (-12.74).
| NLCCX | RGAFX | NLCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.34 | 468% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.34 | 468% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.920 | -7.485 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 699M | 272B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.66 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.48 | -1.74 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.00 | 9.85 | -122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.74 | 52.56 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.81 | 56.31 | -7% |