Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAFX
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAFX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$35.86
Change+$0.10 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets836.39M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$87.81
Change-$0.15 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NLCCX (836M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAFX (0.55) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.27 vs. NLCCX (15.05). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. NLCCX (-9.97).
| NLCCX | RGAFX | NLCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.34 | 468% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.34 | 468% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.609 | 17.992 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 836M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 18.27 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.99 | 61.26 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.97 | 50.83 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.07 | 104.93 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement