Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAFX
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAFX
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NLCCX (768M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAFX (0.46) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NLCCX (29 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. NLCCX (-5.44). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.20 vs. NLCCX (-28.58).
| NLCCX | RGAFX | NLCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.34 | 482% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.34 | 482% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.396 | 6.478 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 768M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.44 | 8.96 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.34 | 46.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.58 | 17.20 | -166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.50 | 116.72 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement