Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAFX
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAFX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$36.45
Change+$0.30 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets843.08M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$89.05
Change+$0.75 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.73B
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. NLCCX (843M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAFX (0.53) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.45 vs. NLCCX (12.13). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.31 vs. NLCCX (-14.09).
| NLCCX | RGAFX | NLCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.34 | 482% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.34 | 482% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.512 | 19.659 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 843M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.13 | 14.45 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.09 | 73.16 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.09 | 44.31 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.39 | 101.40 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement