Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAFX
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAFX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$36.08
Change-$0.11 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.35M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$88.50
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NLCCX (849M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAFX (0.55) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.97 vs. NLCCX (16.11). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.21 vs. NLCCX (-9.23).
| NLCCX | RGAFX | NLCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.34 | 468% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.34 | 468% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.636 | 18.920 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 849M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.11 | 17.97 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.71 | 64.43 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.23 | 50.21 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.02 | 107.59 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement