Ad is loading...
NLCCX vs RGAFX
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAFX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$29.67
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets752.14M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$72.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. NLCCX (752M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAFX (0.65) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.45 vs. NLCCX (1.09). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.83 vs. NLCCX (-15.23).
| NLCCX | RGAFX | NLCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.34 | 468% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.34 | 468% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.656 | -2.459 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 752M | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.09 | 3.45 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.48 | 33.96 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.23 | 45.83 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.78 | 63.63 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...