Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAGX
NLCCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAGX
NLCCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NLCCX (768M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAGX (0.51) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NLCCX (29 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAGX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. NLCCX (-3.59). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. NLCCX (-27.47).
| NLCCX | RGAGX | NLCCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.29 | 566% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.29 | 566% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.265 | 8.887 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 768M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.59 | 12.55 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.42 | 50.34 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.47 | 20.99 | -131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.46 | 122.10 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement