NLR
Price
$119.95
Change
+$0.76 (+0.64%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
4.18B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NUKZ
Price
$65.70
Change
+$0.78 (+1.20%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
743.38M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLR vs NUKZ

NLR vs NUKZ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) vs. Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) offers concentrated exposure to the global nuclear energy value chain with fewer holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.52%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) provides broader diversification across advanced reactors, utilities, construction, and fuel segments at a higher 0.85% expense ratio.
  • NLR tracks the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index with approximately 27-29 holdings heavily weighted toward energy and utilities sectors, whereas NUKZ follows a custom nuclear renaissance strategy with 46-53 holdings emphasizing industrials and utilities.
  • Both ETFs target the nuclear energy theme but differ in concentration risk: NLR maintains tighter focus on uranium mining and nuclear power generation, while NUKZ incorporates more construction, services, and advanced reactor technologies.
  • NLR’s passive index-tracking approach and established structure since 2007 contrast with NUKZ’s newer 2024 inception and thematic index methodology focused on the nuclear renaissance.
  • Cost efficiency favors NLR, while NUKZ may appeal to investors seeking wider exposure to emerging nuclear technologies and related infrastructure.
  • Both funds exhibit similar thematic drivers from rising global demand for clean baseload power, though their sector allocations create distinct risk and return profiles.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the nuclear energy sector often compare specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that capture different facets of this thematic opportunity. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) both provide access to companies involved in nuclear power but pursue distinct strategies. NLR delivers concentrated exposure to uranium and traditional nuclear utilities, while NUKZ emphasizes a broader renaissance theme including advanced reactors and supporting infrastructure. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles for investors with similar long-term goals in clean energy and nuclear technology.

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) Overview

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index before fees and expenses. The fund holds approximately 27-29 securities focused on uranium mining, nuclear power generation, reactor construction, and related services. Top holdings typically include Constellation Energy Corporation, Cameco Corporation, Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated, BWX Technologies, Inc., and Fortum Oyj. Sector allocations are dominated by energy at roughly 50-52%, utilities at 29-31%, and industrials at 16-17%. NLR operates as a passive index-tracking ETF with a net expense ratio of 0.52% and maintains a global mandate. Its established structure since 2007 supports liquidity and a focused thematic profile centered on the core nuclear fuel cycle.

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) Overview

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) tracks a custom index targeting companies involved in the nuclear renaissance, with segments including advanced reactors, utilities, construction and services, and fuel. The fund holds 46-53 securities and allocates approximately 47% to industrials, 36-37% to utilities, and 10-11% to energy. Prominent holdings often feature Cameco Corporation, GE Vernova Inc., Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, and various European utilities. NUKZ employs a passive thematic index strategy launched in early 2024 with an expense ratio of 0.85%. Its broader holdings base and emphasis on infrastructure and advanced technologies distinguish it from more traditional nuclear exposure vehicles.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The nuclear energy sector benefits from sustained policy support for low-carbon baseload power amid global decarbonization efforts. Key catalysts include regulatory approvals for new reactor projects, rising electricity demand from data centers and electrification, and supply constraints in uranium markets. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories and energy security concerns influence capital flows into nuclear-related equities. Risks encompass regulatory delays, geopolitical tensions affecting fuel supply, and competition from alternative renewables. Both ETFs operate within this environment, where long-term structural demand for nuclear capacity supports the thematic narrative across utilities, mining, and technology providers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, NLR has demonstrated performance tied closely to uranium price movements and earnings from major nuclear utilities, reflecting its concentrated energy and utilities tilt. NUKZ has shown sensitivity to industrial and construction sector rotation, benefiting from momentum in advanced reactor development and infrastructure spending. Relative positioning reveals NLR’s higher concentration potentially leading to greater volatility during commodity cycles, while NUKZ’s diversified holdings may moderate swings through broader sector exposure. Both ETFs respond to shifts in interest rate expectations and geopolitical developments affecting energy markets, with NLR more directly linked to fuel dynamics and NUKZ more attuned to technology and services growth.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely favor VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) at present due to its lower expense ratio, established passive structure, concentrated yet durable exposure to core nuclear fundamentals, and favorable cost-efficiency profile relative to the broader thematic mandate of Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). NLR’s structural strengths in diversification within the nuclear value chain and consistent index methodology support a probabilistic edge in risk-adjusted positioning within the sector.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NLR vs. NUKZ commentary
Sep 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLR is a StrongBuy and NUKZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLR has more net assets: 4.18B vs. NUKZ (743M). NUKZ has a higher annual dividend yield than NLR: NUKZ (3.465) vs NLR (-3.422). NLR was incepted earlier than NUKZ: NLR (19 years) vs NUKZ (3 years). NLR (0.52) has a lower expense ratio than NUKZ (0.85). NLR has a higher turnover NUKZ (23.00) vs NUKZ (23.00).
NLRNUKZNLR / NUKZ
Gain YTD-3.4223.465-99%
Net Assets4.18B743M563%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.8561%
Turnover42.0023.00183%
Yield2.670.89299%
Fund Existence19 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLRNUKZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NUKZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHRSX23.22N/A
N/A
Invesco Charter S
SMVZX13.90N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity R6
TSLFX6.48N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Value R4
PSVKX23.66N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R4
TCIWX31.97N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Eq Idx W