NLR
Price
$96.31
Change
+$1.39 (+1.46%)
Updated
Oct 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.08B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XME
Price
$101.32
Change
+$0.82 (+0.82%)
Updated
Oct 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLR vs XME

NLR vs XME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) vs. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) provides targeted exposure to the global nuclear energy and uranium supply chain through a concentrated portfolio of approximately 28 holdings, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) delivers broad U.S. metals and mining exposure via a modified equal-weighted index of roughly 39-41 holdings.
  • NLR tracks the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index with a 0.52% expense ratio and features significant allocations to utilities and nuclear-related industrials, whereas XME follows the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index at a lower 0.35% expense ratio with emphasis on steel, copper, gold, and diversified mining.
  • Both ETFs employ passive strategies but differ in geographic scope: NLR offers international diversification including Canada, Europe, and emerging markets, while XME maintains nearly exclusive U.S. focus across large-, mid-, and small-cap companies.
  • Structural distinctions include NLR’s thematic concentration in nuclear power generation and fuel cycle versus XME’s commodity-cycle sensitivity across multiple metals sub-industries, influencing relative volatility and sector rotation responses.
  • Expense efficiency favors XME, while NLR’s narrower thematic mandate may appeal to investors seeking dedicated nuclear energy positioning amid energy transition trends.
  • Liquidity profiles support institutional and retail use for both funds, with NLR emphasizing non-diversified thematic risk and XME providing modified equal-weighting to mitigate single-stock concentration.

Introduction

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) represent distinct approaches within natural resources investing. NLR targets the nuclear energy ecosystem, while XME focuses on U.S. metals and mining operations. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer complementary or alternative exposure for investors seeking commodity-linked or energy-transition themes. In the current environment of evolving energy policies, infrastructure demands, and commodity price cycles, comparing their structures helps clarify positioning options for diversified portfolios. Both provide passive, rules-based access without leverage or inverse features, allowing investors to evaluate thematic fit versus broad sector representation.

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) Overview

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) seeks to replicate the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, which tracks companies involved in uranium mining, nuclear power facility construction and maintenance, electricity production from nuclear sources, and related equipment or services. The fund holds approximately 28 securities and operates as a passive, non-diversified thematic ETF. Top holdings typically include Constellation Energy Corp (CEG), Cameco Corp (CCJ), Public Service Enterprise Group Inc (PEG), Fortum Oyj, and BWX Technologies Inc (BWXT), with significant weight in utilities and industrials. Sector allocations emphasize energy and utilities alongside producer manufacturing. The expense ratio stands at 0.52%. The index employs market-capitalization weighting with caps and undergoes quarterly review, providing global exposure across developed and select emerging markets.

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) Overview

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) aims to track the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, representing the metals and mining segment of the S&P Total Market Index. The fund maintains roughly 39-41 holdings through a sampling strategy and follows a modified equal-weighted methodology that balances exposure across large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. companies. Prominent holdings generally feature Reliance Inc (RS), Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF), Steel Dynamics Inc (STLD), Nucor Corp (NUE), and Commercial Metals Co (CMC), spanning steel, copper, gold, and diversified metals. Sector breakdown centers on materials with supplementary energy and industrials components. The expense ratio is 0.35%. The index undergoes quarterly rebalancing and focuses exclusively on U.S.-listed issuers in aluminum, coal, copper, gold, silver, and steel sub-industries.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The natural resources sector encompasses both nuclear energy development and traditional metals extraction, influenced by macroeconomic factors including electricity demand growth, infrastructure spending, and commodity price fluctuations. Nuclear themes benefit from policy support for low-carbon baseload power and supply chain investments, while metals and mining respond to industrial production cycles, construction activity, and global trade dynamics. Regulatory developments around permitting, environmental standards, and trade tariffs can affect both areas. Capital flows into thematic energy transition strategies have supported nuclear-related assets in recent market cycles, whereas metals exposure remains sensitive to broader economic expansion and inventory levels. Risks include geopolitical supply disruptions, regulatory changes, and shifts in interest rate expectations that influence capital-intensive projects.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has shown sensitivity to nuclear policy announcements and uranium market fundamentals, with performance tied to earnings from major utilities and miners. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has reflected commodity price movements and steel demand patterns, exhibiting greater responsiveness to industrial production data and metal price volatility. Relative positioning highlights NLR’s potential for lower correlation to broad equity markets during energy transition periods, contrasted with XME’s higher beta to economic growth indicators. Volatility differences arise from NLR’s concentrated thematic holdings versus XME’s diversified yet equal-weighted commodity exposure. Sector rotation effects in recent weeks and months have underscored these distinctions, with nuclear themes demonstrating resilience amid power demand growth and metals facing variable responses to manufacturing cycles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like NLR or XME can leverage this platform for systematic analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across U.S. mining sub-industries, and modified equal-weighting methodology that reduces single-name concentration risk. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) offers compelling thematic alignment with nuclear energy momentum but carries higher costs and greater concentration. Final selection depends on individual investor objectives regarding thematic exposure versus cost efficiency and sector breadth.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NLR vs. XME commentary
Oct 29, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLR is a StrongBuy and XME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for NLR with price predictions
Oct 27, 2026

NLR's RSI Indicator climbs out of oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for NLR moved out of oversold territory on October 27, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 29 of the 29 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 49 of 52 cases where NLR's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Following a +5.02% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NLR advanced for three days, in 299 of 336 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.

NLR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NLR turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 35 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 83%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NLR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

The Aroon Indicator for NLR entered a downward trend on October 27, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for XME with price predictions
Oct 27, 2026

XME in -0.60% downward trend, falling for three consecutive days on October 26, 2026

Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where XME declined for three days, in 234 of 267 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for XME turned negative on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 40 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 87%.

XME moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for XME crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

The Aroon Indicator for XME entered a downward trend on October 27, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where XME's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 26 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +2.36% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where XME advanced for three days, in 337 of 363 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

XME may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLRXME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
NLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLR has been closely correlated with OKLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NLR jumps, then OKLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLR
1D Price
Change %
NLR100%
+4.24%
OKLO - NLR
84%
Closely correlated
+5.36%
SMR - NLR
80%
Closely correlated
+8.16%
BWXT - NLR
68%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
DUK - NLR
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
XE - NLR
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.95%
More

XME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XME
1D Price
Change %
XME100%
+4.68%
CDE - XME
77%
Closely correlated
+4.18%
MP - XME
73%
Closely correlated
+9.07%
NEM - XME
72%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
CTGO - XME
70%
Closely correlated
+5.77%
DC - XME
69%
Closely correlated
+7.13%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRCA16.340.59
+3.75%
ProShares Ultra CRCL (CRCA)
JSML87.341.50
+1.75%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML)
TLTP19.620.02
+0.10%
Amplify TLT U.S. Treasury 12% Option Income ETF (TLTP)
KBAB6.45N/A
N/A
KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB)
NBSD49.87-0.21
-0.41%
Neuberger Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD)