NLR
Price
$119.95
Change
+$0.76 (+0.64%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
4.18B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XME
Price
$118.62
Change
+$0.24 (+0.20%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
4.87B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLR vs XME

NLR vs XME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) vs. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME)

Key Takeaways

  • NLR provides targeted exposure to the global uranium and nuclear energy value chain through a passive strategy tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, with approximately 29 holdings and a 0.52% expense ratio.
  • XME delivers broad access to the U.S. metals and mining sector via a modified equal-weighted approach tracking the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index, featuring around 39 holdings and a lower 0.35% expense ratio.
  • The ETFs differ significantly in thematic focus: NLR emphasizes nuclear utilities, uranium miners, and related infrastructure, while XME spans diversified metals including gold, copper, steel, and coal producers.
  • Both funds maintain passive structures with full physical replication and periodic rebalancing, though XME’s equal-weight methodology reduces concentration risk relative to market-cap approaches.
  • NLR exhibits higher sector-specific concentration in utilities and materials tied to nuclear power, whereas XME offers greater diversification across basic materials sub-industries.
  • Expense efficiency favors XME, while thematic alignment with energy transition trends may support NLR’s positioning in certain macroeconomic environments.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to energy transition themes or commodity cycles often evaluate specialized sector ETFs. NLR and XME do not compete directly; instead, they offer distinct strategies within broader natural resources and materials sectors. NLR targets the nuclear energy ecosystem, while XME provides diversified metals and mining exposure. Comparing these funds helps investors assess trade-offs between concentrated thematic bets and broader commodity participation, particularly amid evolving capital flows toward clean energy and industrial metals demand.

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) Overview

The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) is a passive fund that seeks to replicate the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. The index includes companies deriving significant revenue from uranium mining, nuclear power plant construction and maintenance, electricity generation from nuclear sources, and related equipment or services. The ETF holds approximately 29 securities, with top holdings typically including Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG), Cameco Corporation (CCJ), and Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG). Sector allocations concentrate in utilities and materials. It carries a net expense ratio of 0.52% and employs full physical replication with periodic index rebalancing. Distinguishing features include its non-diversified structure and focus on the nuclear value chain across developed markets.

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) Overview

The SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is a passive fund designed to track the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index, which represents the metals and mining segment of the S&P Total Market Index. The index covers sub-industries such as aluminum, copper, diversified metals, gold, silver, steel, and coal. The ETF typically holds around 39 securities using a modified equal-weighted methodology that limits single-stock concentration. Top holdings often feature companies such as Centrus Energy (LEU), Hecla Mining (HL), and Freeport-McMoRan (FCX). Sector exposure centers on basic materials with some energy overlap. It maintains a net expense ratio of 0.35% and uses a sampling strategy for efficient replication alongside regular rebalancing.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within natural resources and materials sectors influenced by global energy demand, infrastructure spending, and commodity price cycles. Nuclear power receives support from decarbonization policies and rising electricity needs in data centers and manufacturing, potentially benefiting NLR constituents. Metals and mining face drivers including electric vehicle production, renewable energy infrastructure, and industrial output, which may affect XME holdings. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate paths, supply chain developments, and regulatory changes in mining and energy continue to shape capital allocation across these themes. Risks include commodity volatility, geopolitical tensions affecting supply, and shifts in government policy toward specific energy sources.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, NLR has shown sensitivity to nuclear policy announcements and uranium price movements, with performance tied to earnings from utilities and miners. XME has reflected broader metals price trends and industrial activity, often exhibiting volatility linked to economic growth expectations and commodity demand. Relative positioning highlights NLR’s narrower focus potentially leading to higher sector-specific swings, while XME’s equal-weighted construction may moderate concentration effects during rotations within materials sub-sectors. Both have participated in commodity-driven rallies and corrections over recent weeks and months, with positioning influenced by interest rate expectations and global supply dynamics rather than isolated daily moves.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to NLR due to its concentrated thematic alignment with nuclear energy momentum, despite the higher expense ratio. XME offers cost efficiency and broader diversification that may appeal in different cycles. The edge for NLR stems from sector momentum and diversification profile within its niche, though outcomes remain subject to evolving macro conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NLR vs. XME commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLR is a StrongBuy and XME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XME has more net assets: 4.87B vs. NLR (4.18B). XME has a higher annual dividend yield than NLR: XME (14.636) vs NLR (-3.422). NLR was incepted earlier than XME: NLR (19 years) vs XME (20 years). XME (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than NLR (0.52). XME has a higher turnover NLR (42.00) vs NLR (42.00).
NLRXMENLR / XME
Gain YTD-3.42214.636-23%
Net Assets4.18B4.87B86%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.35149%
Turnover42.0048.0088%
Yield2.670.32847%
Fund Existence19 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLRXME
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHPS83.823.12
+3.87%
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
SDS54.120.46
+0.86%
ProShares UltraShort S&P500
VIOV118.130.65
+0.55%
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
FEGE53.03-0.32
-0.60%
FIRST EAGLE GLOBAL EQUITY ETF
CCOR26.25-0.24
-0.92%
Core Alternative Capital

NLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLR has been closely correlated with SMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NLR jumps, then SMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLR
1D Price
Change %
NLR100%
+0.64%
SMR - NLR
80%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
BWXT - NLR
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
DUK - NLR
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
ETR - NLR
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
EXC - NLR
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
More

XME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XME
1D Price
Change %
XME100%
+0.20%
CDE - XME
77%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
NEM - XME
71%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
MP - XME
71%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
CLF - XME
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
CMP - XME
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
More