NMAKF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
638.63M
PHIN
Price
$56.69
Change
+$0.22 (+0.39%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.21B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMAKF vs PHIN

Header iconNMAKF vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts NMAKF vs PHINBanner chart's image
NEMAK S A B DE C V
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$862
Capitalization638.63M
PHINIA
Price$56.69
Change+$0.22 (+0.39%)
Volume$277.05K
Capitalization2.21B
NMAKF vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
NMAKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMAKF vs. PHIN commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMAKF is a Hold and PHIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NMAKF: $0.17 vs. PHIN: $56.69)
Brand notoriety: NMAKF and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMAKF: 100% vs. PHIN: 65%
Market capitalization -- NMAKF: $638.63M vs. PHIN: $2.21B
NMAKF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $638.63M. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMAKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NMAKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMAKF is a better buy in the long-term than PHIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMAKF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMAKF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the short-term than NMAKF.

Price Growth

NMAKF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.65% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.21B) has a higher market cap than NMAKF($639M). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than NMAKF: PHIN (21.80) vs NMAKF (19.14). NMAKF YTD gains are higher at: 83.913 vs. PHIN (19.650). PHIN (452M) and NMAKF (444M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . PHIN (347M) and NMAKF (335M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PHIN has less debt than NMAKF: PHIN (1.04B) vs NMAKF (1.92B). NMAKF has higher revenues than PHIN: NMAKF (4.92B) vs PHIN (3.36B).
NMAKFPHINNMAKF / PHIN
Capitalization639M2.21B29%
EBITDA444M452M98%
Gain YTD83.91319.650427%
P/E Ratio19.1421.8088%
Revenue4.92B3.36B146%
Total Cash335M347M97%
Total Debt1.92B1.04B184%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMAKFPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMAKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLVIX41.290.26
+0.63%
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst2
FCPIX38.470.20
+0.52%
Fidelity Advisor Intl Cap App I
HRLRX9.770.03
+0.31%
Hartford Real Asset R3
MOPAX26.930.07
+0.26%
NYLI WMC Small Companies Class A
UGTIX29.680.01
+0.03%
Victory Growth and Tax Strategy Ins

NMAKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMAKF and LKQ have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMAKF and LKQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMAKF
1D Price
Change %
NMAKF100%
N/A
LKQ - NMAKF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
SCTH - NMAKF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLRD - NMAKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHIN - NMAKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
PASTF - NMAKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+0.39%
BWA - PHIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
VC - PHIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
AXL - PHIN
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
ATMU - PHIN
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
ALV - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
More