NNOMF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.04 (-8.89%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
261.42M
OLN
Price
$23.89
Change
-$0.18 (-0.75%)
Updated
Mar 11, 03:01 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.03B
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NNOMF vs OLN

Header iconNNOMF vs OLN Comparison
Open Charts NNOMF vs OLNBanner chart's image
Nano One Materials
Price$0.41
Change-$0.04 (-8.89%)
Volume$38.18K
Capitalization261.42M
Olin
Price$23.89
Change-$0.18 (-0.75%)
Volume$750
Capitalization7.03B
NNOMF vs OLN Comparison Chart
Loading...
NNOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NNOMF vs. OLN commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNOMF is a Hold and OLN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (NNOMF: $0.41 vs. OLN: $24.07)
Brand notoriety: NNOMF and OLN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NNOMF: 87% vs. OLN: 111%
Market capitalization -- NNOMF: $261.42M vs. OLN: $7.03B
NNOMF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $261.42M. OLN’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $7.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NNOMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOLN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NNOMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OLN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OLN is a better buy in the long-term than NNOMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NNOMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NNOMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OLN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OLN is a better buy in the short-term than NNOMF.

Price Growth

NNOMF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -15.68% price change this week, while OLN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLN is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.10% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OLN($7.04B) has a higher market cap than NNOMF($261M). NNOMF YTD gains are higher at: -26.705 vs. OLN (-28.217). OLN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. NNOMF (-18.35M). OLN has more cash in the bank: 170M vs. NNOMF (40.1M). NNOMF has less debt than OLN: NNOMF (1.12M) vs OLN (3.02B). OLN has higher revenues than NNOMF: OLN (6.83B) vs NNOMF (0).
NNOMFOLNNNOMF / OLN
Capitalization261M7.04B4%
EBITDA-18.35M1.27B-1%
Gain YTD-26.705-28.21795%
P/E RatioN/A16.71-
Revenue06.83B-
Total Cash40.1M170M24%
Total Debt1.12M3.02B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NNOMF vs OLN: Fundamental Ratings
NNOMF
OLN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5257
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
9679
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8195
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a38

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLN's Valuation (36) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNOMF (74) in the null industry. This means that OLN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

OLN's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as NNOMF (100) in the null industry. This means that OLN’s stock grew similarly to NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

OLN's SMR Rating (79) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as NNOMF (96) in the null industry. This means that OLN’s stock grew similarly to NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

NNOMF's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as OLN (95) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that NNOMF’s stock grew similarly to OLN’s over the last 12 months.

OLN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for NNOMF (100) in the null industry. This means that OLN’s stock grew significantly faster than NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NNOMFOLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NNOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSI4.900.04
+0.72%
TCW Strategic Income Fund
JCPB46.920.15
+0.32%
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
SQEW31.49-0.77
-2.38%
LeaderShares® Equity Skew ETF
VOTE65.71-1.87
-2.77%
TCW Transform 500 ETF
TPOR27.14-2.22
-7.56%
Direxion Dly Transp Bull 3X Shrs ETF

NNOMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNOMF has been loosely correlated with ECVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NNOMF jumps, then ECVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNOMF
1D Price
Change %
NNOMF100%
-8.39%
ECVT - NNOMF
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.01%
TROX - NNOMF
38%
Loosely correlated
-4.45%
CE - NNOMF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
OEC - NNOMF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.90%
OLN - NNOMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
More

OLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLN has been closely correlated with HUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OLN jumps, then HUN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLN
1D Price
Change %
OLN100%
-1.35%
HUN - OLN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
WLK - OLN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
DOW - OLN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
PPG - OLN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
AVNT - OLN
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
More