Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs PRJAX
NPFCX vs PRJAX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs PRJAX
NPFCX vs PRJAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. PRJAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and PRJAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. PRJAX (4.48B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than PRJAX: NPFCX (0.33) vs PRJAX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than PRJAX: NPFCX (25 years) vs PRJAX (14 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than PRJAX (1.21). PRJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRJAX: NPFCX (250) vs PRJAX (1000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. PRJAX (-14.08). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.52 vs. PRJAX (-18.41).
| NPFCX | PRJAX | NPFCX / PRJAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.08 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.21 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.931 | 5.235 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 4.48B | 3,797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | -14.08 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.32 | 7.71 | 394% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.52 | -18.41 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.35 | 163.51 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers