Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs SCGVX
NPFCX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs SCGVX
NPFCX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. SCGVX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and SCGVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. SCGVX (739M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: NPFCX (0.33) vs SCGVX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: NPFCX (25 years) vs SCGVX (16 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than SCGVX (1.22). SCGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: NPFCX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. SCGVX (-30.37). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.52 vs. SCGVX (-46.70).
| NPFCX | SCGVX | NPFCX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.22 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.22 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.931 | 2.352 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 739M | 23,004% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | -30.37 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.32 | -13.95 | -217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.52 | -46.70 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.35 | 27.42 | 351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers