Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs SCGVX
NPFCX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs SCGVX
NPFCX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. SCGVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and SCGVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. SCGVX (794M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: NPFCX (0.33) vs SCGVX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: NPFCX (25 years) vs SCGVX (16 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than SCGVX (1.22). SCGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: NPFCX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. SCGVX (-27.84). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.16 vs. SCGVX (-45.31).
| NPFCX | SCGVX | NPFCX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.22 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.22 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.075 | 3.030 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 794M | 21,662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | -27.84 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.44 | -9.13 | -410% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.16 | -45.31 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.02 | 37.12 | 299% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement